When institutions matter: a gravity model for Chinese meat imports

Abstract

Purpose In international trade differences in political and legal systems confront trading partners with relatively greater information asymmetry and contract enforcement problems than in domestic trade, resulting in higher transaction costs. Nevertheless, well-functioning institutions in the exporting country could prove beneficial for the agricultural importer, as institutions generally establish food and product regulations and ensure that they are enforced and serve as a last resort for dispute resolution and contract enforcement. Given China’s increasingly stricter control of its food supply chain and its rising imports of meat products, the purpose of this paper is to analyze whether institutions in the exporting country matter for Chinese meat imports. Design/methodology/approach To analyze the effect of the exporters’ institutions on Chinese meat imports, the authors estimate a gravity model for the 1990-2013 period. The authors apply the method suggested by Helpman et al. (2008) to correct for sample selection and firm heterogeneity. To estimate the effect of time-invariant variables, the authors apply the Fixed Effects Vector Decomposition method proposed by Plümper and Troeger (2007). Findings The results show that institutions affect Chinese trade flows. In particular, the authors find that China imports more meat products from countries who host qualitatively better institutions and are geographically closer, and that the country’s imports rise with its GDP level. This confirms our hypothesis that institutions in the exporting country are positively associated with meat exports to China. Originality/value The importance of the exporters’ institutions for Chinese meat imports has not been studied so far and is of great interest given China’s rising role as a sizable importer. Furthermore, Chinese meat imports have attracted much attention recently due to the country’s potentially significant impact on world food security and sustainable development. Hence, this paper aims to make a substantial contribution to the literature, both from a scientific and a policy perspective.

Determinants of China’s outward foreign direct investment in the Belt & Road economies

“…The model has been widely applied in the estimations and projections of aggregate trade. Several authors, for instances, Nanovsky (2019), Zhou et al (2019), Li, Sun and Long (2019), Shahriar, Qian and Kea (2019), Soeng and Cuyvers (2018), Narayan and Nguyen (2016), Atif et al (2017), Filippini and Molini (2003), Poncet (2006), Batra (2006); Zhou et al (2019); Mitra et al (2018), Gashi et al (2016); Hasiner and Yu (2018) and Ghazalian (2019) applied the model in their empirical works of international trade. The literature is, however, scant in the analysis of the Chinese OFDI along the BRI through an application of the gravity model.…”

Determinants of Bangladesh’s Leather Exports to Its Major Trade Partners: A Panel Gravity Model Approach

“…Second, it applies the gravity model by integrating several approaches (i.e., generalized least square [GLS], Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood [PPML] and Heckman) in a single study. These approaches were applied separately in the existing trade literature, such as GLS (Shahriar et al, 2018), PPML (Hammarlund & Andersson, 2019;Lee & Pyun, 2018;Li et al, 2019) and Heckman selection models (Haq et al, 2013;Hasiner & Yu, 2019;Hwang & Lim, 2017). Nguyen (2020) explains the factors affecting Vietnam's export in rice and coffee, the two most important agricultural products, especially in exploring the role of 'behind-the-border' constraints.…”

Does political risk lower bilateral trade flow? A gravity panel framework for Thailand vis-à-vis her trading partners

“…The gravity framework has become so popular that it has been leading the trade flow literature for a long time under concepts of “static” gravity in the past and “dynamic” gravity in recent time (Koo et al 1994; Anderson and Marcouiller, 2002; Rose, 2005; Hattari and Rajon, 2009; Kabir and Salim, 2010; Yu, 2010). This third kind of literature uses an augmented gravity equation with trade-facilitating factors as well as a trade-obstructing factor in the same equation (Srivastava and Green, 1986; Cyrus, 2002; Dixon and Moon, 1993; Marrow and Tabares, 1998; Groot et al , 2004; Linders et al , 2005; Levchenko, 2007; Martin et al 2008; Fratianni, 2009; Gourdon, 2009; Dutt and Traca, 2010; Musila and Sigue, 2010; Horsewood and Voicu, 2012; Zelekha and Sharabi, 2012; Ali and Mdhillat, 2015; Galkin et al 2018; Devadason et al 2018; Mnasri and Nechi, 2019; Wu et al , 2016; Baier et al 2017; Aziz et al 2018; Hasiner and Yu, 2019; Saputra, 2019).…”