2011
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2011.39.8.1009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Financial Information Meets Religion: Charitable-giving Behavior in Taiwan

Abstract: The effects of religiosity and financial information on charitable-giving behavior were juxtaposed for examination along with other demographic variables in this study. We adopted a survey research design in which 410 adults formed the sample representing people from across Taiwan who were Christians and Buddhists, people who believed in a folk religion, and people who had no religious beliefs. The results indicate that although charitable giving may reasonably be viewed, according to theory of planned behavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although religious people have been found to score higher in various prosocial attitudes (Brooks, 2003(Brooks, , 2005(Brooks, , 2007Friedrichs, 1960;Furrow et al, 2004;Gronbjerg & Never, 2004;Guiso et al, 2003;Lam, 2002;McCullough & Worthington, 1999;Morgan, 1983;Putnam & Campbell, 2010;Su, Chou, & Osborne, 2011), they have also been shown to score higher in a host of negative and antisocial attitudes (Batson, Floyd, Meyer, & Winner, 1999;Cornwall, Perry, Louw, & Stringer, 2012;Park, 2012;Saslow et al, 2012;Stegmueller, Scheepers, Rossteutscher, & de Jong, 2012;Stokes & Regnerus, 2009;Victoroff et al, 2010). It is thus difficult to tell whether any prosocial effects of religion are an indication of general prosociality rather than of favouritism toward an ingroup (Hunter, 2001;Ottoni & Wilhelm, 2010), which might indeed be mirrored by hostility toward outsiders (Burris & Jackson, 1999;Heiphetz, Spelke, & Banaji, 2012;Hunsberger & Jackson, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although religious people have been found to score higher in various prosocial attitudes (Brooks, 2003(Brooks, , 2005(Brooks, , 2007Friedrichs, 1960;Furrow et al, 2004;Gronbjerg & Never, 2004;Guiso et al, 2003;Lam, 2002;McCullough & Worthington, 1999;Morgan, 1983;Putnam & Campbell, 2010;Su, Chou, & Osborne, 2011), they have also been shown to score higher in a host of negative and antisocial attitudes (Batson, Floyd, Meyer, & Winner, 1999;Cornwall, Perry, Louw, & Stringer, 2012;Park, 2012;Saslow et al, 2012;Stegmueller, Scheepers, Rossteutscher, & de Jong, 2012;Stokes & Regnerus, 2009;Victoroff et al, 2010). It is thus difficult to tell whether any prosocial effects of religion are an indication of general prosociality rather than of favouritism toward an ingroup (Hunter, 2001;Ottoni & Wilhelm, 2010), which might indeed be mirrored by hostility toward outsiders (Burris & Jackson, 1999;Heiphetz, Spelke, & Banaji, 2012;Hunsberger & Jackson, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Donor gender [ 40 , 41 ], age [ 29 ], education level [ 29 ], income [ 29 ], and geographical location [ 35 ] had significant effects on donation behaviors. Younger donors were more willingness to donate [ 32 ], and people with higher education and income level were more likely to donate [ 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gifford & Nilsson (2014) consider religion as one of the social determinants. According to Sablosky (2014) and Su, Chou, and Osborne (2011), religiosity impacts significantly on financial decisions. According to Love (2010), marital status has important effects on household decisions, including financial ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%