When Faced With Increasing Complexity: The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Assistance for Drone Design

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) assistance tools become more ubiquitous in engineering design, it becomes increasingly necessary to understand the influence of AI assistance on the design process and design effectiveness. Previous work has shown the advantages of incorporating AI design agents to assist human designers. However, the influence of AI assistance on the behavior of designers during the design process is still unknown. This study examines the differences in participants' design process and effectiveness with and without AI assistance during a complex drone design task using the HyForm design research platform. Data collected from this study is analyzed to assess the design process and effectiveness using quantitative methods, such as Hidden Markov Models and network analysis. The results indicate that AI assistance is most beneficial when addressing moderately complex objectives but exhibits a reduced advantage in addressing highly complex objectives. During the design process, the individual designers working with AI assistance employ a relatively explorative search strategy, while the individual designers working without AI assistance devote more effort to parameter design.

From Image to Imagination: Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Cultural Translation in Jewelry Design

“…Additionally, increasing studies concentrate on the challenges and opportunities of human-AI collaboration in diverse contexts [19][20][21]. Based on some empirical studies, the AI agent assists designers in diversifying their solutions to fulfill the design objectives and presents great potential to guide more explorative design strategies [22,23]. However, in terms of generative AI, there is a great limitation that they are currently only capable of learning and generating spatially visualized representations of design concepts based on training data sets, which are mainly helpful for detail design and may cause design fixation if applied in earlier stages [16].…”

Make it or draw it? Investigating the communicative trade-offs between sketches and prototypes

“…The NASA-TLX has also been used in several studies in design research to measure mental workload (Nolte & McComb 2020;Song et al 2021;Zimmerer & Matthiesen 2021). However, it is important to highlight that the NASA-TLX was originally designed to measure a pilot's mental workload on a flight deck (Hart & Staveland 1988), a task completely different from the cognitive experience of design.…”