2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/3546262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Do Skeletal Class III Patients Wear Their Reverse Pull Headgears?

Abstract: Objective. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors that affect wearing time and patient behavior during reverse pull headgear therapy with a newly designed reverse pull headgear. Methods. In clinical practice, new reverse pull headgears were applied to fifteen patients. The patients were monitored during reverse pull headgear therapy and the data were evaluated. Statistical analysis was made. Results. During the study, patients were monitored successfully and the evaluations showed that patients wear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FM therapy represents the gold standard for correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion in growing subjects [1][2][3][4][5][16][17][18][19]. Several factors play a substantial role in terms of efficacy and effectiveness of orthopedic Class III treatment, including individual skeletal pattern, protraction device adaptation, patients' compliance, and device wear-time [20][21][22][23][24]. Stocker et al [23] and Ozkalayci and Cicek [24] analyzed wearing time and patient compliance with FM reporting a significantly lower wearing time than the prescribed instructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FM therapy represents the gold standard for correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion in growing subjects [1][2][3][4][5][16][17][18][19]. Several factors play a substantial role in terms of efficacy and effectiveness of orthopedic Class III treatment, including individual skeletal pattern, protraction device adaptation, patients' compliance, and device wear-time [20][21][22][23][24]. Stocker et al [23] and Ozkalayci and Cicek [24] analyzed wearing time and patient compliance with FM reporting a significantly lower wearing time than the prescribed instructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors play a substantial role in terms of efficacy and effectiveness of orthopedic Class III treatment, including individual skeletal pattern, protraction device adaptation, patients' compliance, and device wear-time [20][21][22][23][24]. Stocker et al [23] and Ozkalayci and Cicek [24] analyzed wearing time and patient compliance with FM reporting a significantly lower wearing time than the prescribed instructions. The not customized design of both FM models can cause poor device adaptation to the patient's face.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The facemask appliance needs to worn by the patient for 12 to 14 hours daily. 10 It is recommended that the age for effective treatment was ranges between 6 to 8 years (early mixed dentition) or 9 to 12 years (late mixed dentition). 11 Facemask along with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) to protract the maxilla has become a treatment protocol in cases with maxillary deficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%