1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01149835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Danny said no! Refusal of treatment by a patient of questionable competence

Abstract: The patient we call Danny was a mildly mentally retarded male in his mid-thirties who adamantly refused kidney dialysis when it was offered as the only therapeutic option for his progressive kidney failure. It was uncertain how fully Danny understood the implications of his refusal. To complicate the case still further, several "advocates" emerged to speak on Danny's behalf--each with a somewhat different interpretation of the situation and different sets of value presuppositions and ethical principles to appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moon (Moon & Graber, 1985) presents the case of a person with mild ID whose kidneys failed in end-stage renal disease. Treatments for this disease usually involve two heroic procedures that involve considerable pain and great inconvenience (surgery for transplantation of kidneys or renal dialysis) that "Danny'' apparently partially understood, and, consequently, he adamantly refused the dialysis option.…”
Section: Informed Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moon (Moon & Graber, 1985) presents the case of a person with mild ID whose kidneys failed in end-stage renal disease. Treatments for this disease usually involve two heroic procedures that involve considerable pain and great inconvenience (surgery for transplantation of kidneys or renal dialysis) that "Danny'' apparently partially understood, and, consequently, he adamantly refused the dialysis option.…”
Section: Informed Consentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For health professionals, it can be challenging to deal with situations where people with intellectual disability are actively resisting necessary medical examination and treatment (Heslop, Marriott, Hoghton, Jepson, & Noble, 2014; Moon & Graber, 1985). Intellectual disability is characterised by significant limitations in cognitive functioning and adaptive behaviour emerging during childhood (Emerson & Einfeld, 2011), and some individuals lack or have reduced capacity to make decisions about health matters (Goldsmith, Skirton, & Webb, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%