Ecscw 2003 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Can I Expect an Email Response? A Study of Rhythms in Email Usage

Abstract: Abstract.A study of email responsiveness was conducted to understand how the timing of email responses conveys important information. Interviews and observations explored users' perceptions of how they responded to email and formed expectations of others' responses to them. We identified ways in which users maintain and cultivate a responsiveness image for projecting expectations about their email response. We also discuss other contextual cues people use to discover email responsiveness, which include using o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, temporal aspects of collaboration have been analyzed in relation to a number of collaboration technologies such as email (Tyler and Tang 2003) and groupware calendar systems (Lee 2003;Crabtree et al 2003). There are a few studies that show interest in longer timeframes including articles highlighting aspects of long-term interaction in office work (Dix et al 1998), the need to bridge the gap between face-to-face communication in long-term collaboration (Lindstaedt and Schneider 1997), the necessity to consider both real-time supervisory control work and differently paced design work (Sandusky 2003), and long-term collaboration in software maintenance (Lougher and Rodden 1993).…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, temporal aspects of collaboration have been analyzed in relation to a number of collaboration technologies such as email (Tyler and Tang 2003) and groupware calendar systems (Lee 2003;Crabtree et al 2003). There are a few studies that show interest in longer timeframes including articles highlighting aspects of long-term interaction in office work (Dix et al 1998), the need to bridge the gap between face-to-face communication in long-term collaboration (Lindstaedt and Schneider 1997), the necessity to consider both real-time supervisory control work and differently paced design work (Sandusky 2003), and long-term collaboration in software maintenance (Lougher and Rodden 1993).…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Email is used to forward information such as documents, URLs, and other people's email messages, as well as to schedule face-to-face and phone meetings. Sometimes, email will be used in tandem with another communication medium such as voicemail, for example, when an important email is followed up by a voicemail to make sure that the email is read (Tyler and Tang, 2003).…”
Section: Search In An Email Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dominant observation pertains to the temporal aspect, i.e., "when" a particular other will access ubicomp. Other observations span a wide range, from tool usage habits to contextual information (e.g., location of recipient, urgency of topic, one's schedule) [36]. For example, if you usually take one day to respond to e-mails, others will infer that you have daily, rather than round-the-clock, access to e-mail and will accordingly adjust their response-time expectations.…”
Section: Rule #mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we often expect others to check e-mails less frequently during weekends. That is why we will not get upset if we do not receive a reply until Monday [36].…”
Section: Rule #mentioning
confidence: 99%