2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abee11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Are LIGO/Virgo’s Big Black Hole Mergers?

Abstract: We study the evolution of the binary black hole (BBH) mass distribution across cosmic time. The second gravitational-wave transient catalog (GWTC-2) from LIGO/Virgo contains BBH events out to redshifts z ∼ 1, with component masses in the range ∼5–80 M ⊙. In this catalog, the biggest BBHs, with m 1 ≳ 45 M ⊙, are only found at the highest redshifts, z ≳ 0.4. We ask whether the absence of high-mass observations at low redshift indicates that the mass distribut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstgeneration black holes may predominantly arise in scenarios with a common-envelope history, which would lead to aligned spins (Kalogera 2000;Mandel & O'Shaughnessy 2010;Dominik et al 2013;Giacobbo et al 2018;Eldridge et al 2017;Olejak et al 2020), whereas second-generation black holes would be formed hierarchically and thereby have a more uniform spin distribution (Rodriguez et al 2016;Vitale et al 2017). One might also plausibly expect characteristic differences in the redshift (Fishbach et al 2021) and eccentricity (Samsing et al 2014;Samsing 2018;Rodriguez et al 2018;Zevin et al 2019) distributions between first-generation and second-generation black holes. These will be easy to incorporate in our model, and we look forward to future work that incorporates models for these physical effects alongside the ones that we have modeled, which we have argued are revealed by the mass function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstgeneration black holes may predominantly arise in scenarios with a common-envelope history, which would lead to aligned spins (Kalogera 2000;Mandel & O'Shaughnessy 2010;Dominik et al 2013;Giacobbo et al 2018;Eldridge et al 2017;Olejak et al 2020), whereas second-generation black holes would be formed hierarchically and thereby have a more uniform spin distribution (Rodriguez et al 2016;Vitale et al 2017). One might also plausibly expect characteristic differences in the redshift (Fishbach et al 2021) and eccentricity (Samsing et al 2014;Samsing 2018;Rodriguez et al 2018;Zevin et al 2019) distributions between first-generation and second-generation black holes. These will be easy to incorporate in our model, and we look forward to future work that incorporates models for these physical effects alongside the ones that we have modeled, which we have argued are revealed by the mass function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the higher-generation black hole merger rate will not be completely negligible, nevertheless we emphasize that such objects are rare by assumption: not every first-generation black hole merger product will be involved in a higher-generation merger within a Hubble time. In addition, properly accounting for the contributions of these higher-generation black holes to the merger rate will entail accounting for mass-and environment-dependence related to the efficiency of formation of higher-generation binary systems (Chatziioannou et al 2019;Arca Sedda et al 2020;Fishbach et al 2021). For the parameters of interest in this work, we find that Equation (5) has a discernible two-sided peak at…”
Section: Bhmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…peak multi-source (separate BH mass models in BH-BH and NS-BH binaries) and Binned Gaussian process (unmodelled with regularisation). Secondly, another uncertainty arises from the possibility that the merger rate varies with redshift, for which there is already significant support in the data (Fishbach et al 2021;Abbott et al 2021e). Allowing for the variation of the merger rate with redshift (but not yet of the mass distribution with redshift, although some theoretical models predict this) further shifts the binary black hole merger rate at redshift z ¼ 0.…”
Section: Gravitational Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, we do not know much about the origin of these black holes. There is a possibility that those are ordinary astrophysical black holes from stellar collapses (possibly from different channels) [7,8]. The other interesting conjecture is that the LIGO detectors have detected primordial black holes (PBHs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%