What you look at is what you get

Jacob, Rob; Stellmach, Sophie

doi:10.1145/2978577

Cited by 54 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many interactive tools based on gaze-control have been developed to provide services and communication methods for mobility-impaired individuals, such as those with ALS, and provide more novel experiences and control methods for general consumers in service industries such as advertising and games (Hyrskykari et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2016). Because of its advantages, such as rapidity, naturalness, and scientificity (Bates & Istance, 2003;Jacob & Stellmach, 2016;Turner, 2013), gazecontrol interaction can significantly change the existing GUIs (Kumar & Winograd, 2007;Selker, 2004;Vertegaal, 2003).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving accuracy of gaze‐control tools: Design recommendations for optimum position, sizes, and spacing of interactive objects

Niu

Zuo

Yang

et al. 2021

Hum Ftrs & Erg Mfg Svc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To investigate a suitable design of interactive objects in the fixation-triggered eyecontrol interface, this study conducted two ergonomic experiments based on the location of an object, area of the object, and distance between adjacent objects. Experiment 1 investigated the priority distribution of different regions and recommended values of object sizes in different regions. The results showed that middle-middle (MM) area is the optimal area, while middle-left (ML) area, middleright (MR) area, and upper-left (UL) area are suboptimal areas, and the remaining are general areas. The recommended minimum sizes for the optimal area, suboptimal area, and general area are 2.636°(200 px on the screen of a 1920 px × 1080 px 14 inch monitor), 2.978°(225 px on the screen of a 1920 px × 1080 px 14 inch monitor) and 3.322°(250 px on the screen of a 1920 px × 1080 px 14-inch monitor), respectively. Experiment 2 conducted ergonomic experiments of different distances between adjacent objects in horizontal and vertical distributions.The results showed that the appropriate setting of the distribution and size of the objects showed no significant difference between different levels of spacing on the trigger accuracy rate and task completion time. Further, 1.032°(75 px on the screen of a 1920 px × 1080 px 14-inch monitor) could be recommended as the most suitable spacing. According to the conclusions of Experiments 1 and 2, an optimized eye-control interface and the NASA-TLX scale were used to verify the validity and scientificity of the experimental results. The conclusions can be employed to improve the interaction efficiency of the eye-control system and user experience and expand the application field of eye control.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving accuracy of gaze‐control tools: Design recommendations for optimum position, sizes, and spacing of interactive objects

Niu

Zuo

Yang

et al. 2021

Hum Ftrs & Erg Mfg Svc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interfaces and interactions using eye movement have potential benefits, and this has been studied for the past 40 years in the human-computer interaction (HCI) domain [5]. Further, there are also conducted studies on how to manipulate an avatar in a virtual space using gaze interaction [9].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterizing the Coordinating Behaviors in a Three vs. One Ball Possession Game using Gaze Interaction

Akiyama

Kijima

et al. 2020

Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Gesture-based interfaces have generated numerous studies on interpretation (Nuernberger et al 2016;Wozniak et al 2016), and haptic feedback (Tatsumi et al 2015;Tamaki et al 2016). Eye-tracking is not a new concept, but combined with MR to form a gaze-based interface is an area which has piqued researchers' interest (Park et al 2016;Jacob and Stellmach 2016;Lee et al 2017).…”

Section: Fig 2 Number Of Publication Through the Yearsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interface of mixed reality: from the past to the future

Chen

Duh

2019

CCF Trans. Pervasive Comp. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mixed reality (MR) is an emerging technology which could potentially shape the future of our everyday lives by its unique approach to presenting information. Technology is changing rapidly and information can be presented on traditional computer screens following a WIMP (Windows, Icons, Menus, and Pointing) interface model, by using a head-mounted display to present virtual reality, or by MR which the process of presenting information through a combination of both virtual and physical elements. This paper classifies MR interfaces by applying a text mining method to a data base of 4296 relevant research papers published over the last two decades. The classification reveals the trends relating to each topic and the relations between them. This paper reviews the earlier studies and discusses the recent developments in each topic area and summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the MR interface. Our objective is to assist researchers understand the trend for each topic and allows them to focus on the research challenges where technological advancements in the MR interface are most needed.

show abstract

What you look at is what you get

Abstract: Envisioning, designing, and implementing the user interface require a comprehensive understanding of interaction technologies. In this forum we scout trends and discuss new technologies with the potential to influence interaction design. --- Albrecht Schmidt, Editor

Cited by 54 publications

References 5 publications

Improving accuracy of gaze‐control tools: Design recommendations for optimum position, sizes, and spacing of interactive objects

Improving accuracy of gaze‐control tools: Design recommendations for optimum position, sizes, and spacing of interactive objects

Characterizing the Coordinating Behaviors in a Three vs. One Ball Possession Game using Gaze Interaction

Interface of mixed reality: from the past to the future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About