2013
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What shall I be, what must I be: neural correlates of personal goal activation

Abstract: How is the brain engaged when people are thinking about their hopes, dreams, and obligations? Regulatory focus theory postulates two classes of personal goals and motivational systems for pursuing them. Ideal goals, such as hopes and aspirations, are pursued via the promotion system through “making good things happen.” Ought goals, such as obligations or responsibilities, are pursued via the prevention system through “keeping bad things from happening.” This study investigated the neural correlates of ideal an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although TEPS provides one validated approach for measuring reward sensitivity, we note that other scales have also been used to relate brain responses to personality traits associated with reward and motivation. For instance, recent work has demonstrated that individual differences in regulatory focus are associated with PCC responses to promotion goals (Strauman et al, 2013) and ventral striatal responses to reward (Scult et al, 2016). These observations suggest that future work may be able to build on our findings be integrating regulatory focus theory and other personality measures with classical measures of reward sensitivity (e.g., TEPS and BIS/BAS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TEPS provides one validated approach for measuring reward sensitivity, we note that other scales have also been used to relate brain responses to personality traits associated with reward and motivation. For instance, recent work has demonstrated that individual differences in regulatory focus are associated with PCC responses to promotion goals (Strauman et al, 2013) and ventral striatal responses to reward (Scult et al, 2016). These observations suggest that future work may be able to build on our findings be integrating regulatory focus theory and other personality measures with classical measures of reward sensitivity (e.g., TEPS and BIS/BAS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, our observation of increased PCC - left amygdala FC in patients was associated with increased pain and urinary symptom severity. This association may reflect enhanced levels of prevention [31] [52] and fear-avoidance behaviors [45; 57] in UCPPS as part of the chronic pain experience [30]. The hippocampus is implicated in default mode network processes and is functionally connected to the PCC [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another region substantially elicited in the HiGC condition was the precuneus, known to be activated when subjects make choices which may result in lower gain or punishment (Paulus et al, 2003;Roy et al, 2011). The precuneus was also indicated as related to the 'prevention system' (Strauman et al, 2012) conceptualized as a goal-attainment harm-prevention regulatory system by the 'Regulatory Focus Theory' (Higgins, 1997), and its activation during HiGC may represent this role. However, because HiGC conditions also involved the appearance of more balls on the screen, precuneus activation may result from the richer visual scene during HiGC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%