What’s the middle ground? Institutionalized vs. emerging water-related stakeholder engagement processes

Hassenforder, Émeline; Clavreul, Delphine; Akhmouch, Aziza; Ferrand, Nils

doi:10.1080/07900627.2018.1452722

Cited by 17 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…River champions in professional positions often spend time and effort working with landholders to support river rehabilitation on their properties, while using catchment‐framed knowledge to connect projects between properties, with this work situated within broader spatial and temporal contexts. This is often referred to as “middle‐ground” governance (i.e., between top‐down and bottom‐up Hassenforder, Clavreul, Akhmouch, & Ferrand, 2018). Community‐based river champions may connect people and knowledge between property and community scales to establish collaborative networks from the bottom‐up (Box 3).…”

Section: What Do River Champions Do?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Supporting champions in river management

Mould

Fryirs

Lovett³

et al. 2020

WIREs Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

River champions are people working for better water and river management in a range of capacities, and who are particularly influential and effective in driving progress. The championship concept is not new, but tends to emphasize the bold and highly visible leader. This archetypal champion is at odds with the more humble and quieter forms of leadership that we frequently encounter in our work and communities. These less‐visible champions are in danger of being overlooked. A more inclusive characterization of championship can enrich existing conceptualizations. We argue that many river champions lead quietly and are effective because they build and use social capital to influence others. They are well‐connected and can help to bridge scales of management. We advocate that championship must be recognized and supported within and beyond institutions. This can be enacted by rewarding people for their time in ways that are meaningful and appropriate (i.e., not only financially) and by prioritizing connection between people. We offer specific examples of how this can be done in a river management setting. By recognizing and supporting river champions in all their forms, we can maximize their value as a critical component of participatory water and river management systems. This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness. Engineering Water > Planning Water. Human Water > Water Governance.

show abstract

Section: What Do River Champions Do?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Supporting champions in river management

Mould

Fryirs

Lovett³

et al. 2020

WIREs Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…"Formal" stakeholder engagement is organized along the lines of formal requirements and prescriptions, which define the frames within which engagement is to take place. "Informal" stakeholder engagement, in contrast, comes into existence independent of formal prescriptions or requirements (Hassenforder et al, 2018). It entails self-organizing initiatives, along the frames set by the involved stakeholders.…”

Section: Formal and Informal Engagementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Broadening and strengthening stakeholder engagement in emergency preparedness, response and recovery

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses stakeholder engagement in the field of nuclear and radiological emergency preparedness, response, and recovery (EPR & R). It argues that stakeholder engagement in this field could be broadened – in terms of stakeholders and forms of engagement, and strengthened – in terms of sustainability and impact. Four different dimensions are identified and presented along which this process of broadening and strengthening can occur: (1) the underlying rationales of engagement, (2) top-down and bottom-up engagement, (3) formal and informal engagement, and (4) radiological protection culture. Based on the analysis of these dimensions, a reflection on power and non-participation is provided, and recommendations on stakeholder engagement are formulated.

show abstract

“…An important strand of the literature on participation in river management deals with the design of participatory processes to implement projects, tackling issues such as stakeholder identification or effective project communication (Hassenforder et al, 2019; Junker et al, 2007). Another significant body of work focuses on how to integrate stakeholders' perceptions and representations through participatory measures (Buchecker et al, 2013; Heldt et al, 2016; Le Lay et al, 2013; Tunstall et al, 1999).…”

Section: Participation: Empowering or Contesting Experts?mentioning

confidence: 99%

When experts feel threatened: Strategies of depoliticisation in participatory river restoration projects

Mitchell

Ejderyan

2020

Area

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper explores how experts involved in river management projects in Switzerland consider public participation. Based on an analysis of expert discourses, we examine how experts activate different arguments to depoliticise participation. We argue that their consistent motivation to depoliticise also indicates a potential for participation to become political, which is worth exploring with new perspectives to engage the public.

show abstract

What’s the middle ground? Institutionalized vs. emerging water-related stakeholder engagement processes

Cited by 17 publications

References 37 publications

Supporting champions in river management

Supporting champions in river management

Broadening and strengthening stakeholder engagement in emergency preparedness, response and recovery

When experts feel threatened: Strategies of depoliticisation in participatory river restoration projects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About