What's Policy Got to Do with It? Race, Gender & Economic Inequality in the United States

Abstract

In the United States, economic inequality is both racialized and gendered, with Black and Latina women consistently at the bottom of the economic hierarchy. Relative to men (across racial groups) and White women, Black and Latina women often have less-desirable jobs, lower earnings, and higher poverty rates. In this essay, we draw attention to the role of the state in structuring such inequality. Specifically, we examine how public policy is related to racial inequities in economic positions among women. Applying an intersectional lens to the contemporary landscape of economic inequality, we probe the associations between public policies and economic outcomes. We find that policies have unequal consequences across subgroups of women, providing prima facie evidence that state-level decisions about how and where to invest resources have differential implications based on women's race and ethnicity. We encourage scholars to use aspects of our approach as springboards for better specifying and identifying the processes that account for heterogeneous policy effects across racial subgroups of women.

The Political Realignment of Health: How Partisan Power Shaped Infant Health in the United States, 1915–2017

“…These patterns were detected for the institutional arrangements-executive or legislative, national or state-that allow parties to execute a racially conservative agenda. In this sense, population health in the U.S. follows partisan cycles, and it is politicized by means of racialized policy (Michener 2019;Michener and Brower 2020). We also found that the partisan differences in IMRs from before to after the Political Realignment are large and generally statistically significant.…”

Participant compensation in health equity research: How equitable is it?

“…This requirement excludes individuals navigating financial insecurity as well as individuals experiencing difficulties accessing credit or opening back accounts due to poorer credit histories. Interlocking systems of oppression (e.g., classism, racism, and heterosexism) purposely exclude communities from accessing wealth, which limits their ability to use traditional banking methods (Michener & Brower, 2020). Thus, oft promoted forms of participant payments are not appropriate or accessible.…”

Institutional legacies and temporary assistance for needy families spending decisions: the case of the Freedmen’s Bureau

“…We seek to understand a particular manifestation of this path dependence by focusing on social welfare policy in the US, which is widely recognised as a racialised and gendered policy domain (Foster 2008; Michener and Brower 2020). The Freedmen’s Bureau not only helped to establish norms regarding the appropriate function of welfare institutions but also helped to construct the image of the associated target populations (i.e.…”