2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Research Questions Should the Next Generation of Birth Cohort Studies Address? An International Delphi Study of Experts

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main strengths of our feasibility study were its approach to identify eldigible sample using both facility based and a community based approach, high response rate at recruitment, postpartum follow-up and acquiring varied biological samples, using constructs informed by expert opinion through a delphi technique [34], use of validated instruments used in all other EBLS sites making interesting cross cultural comparisons [3]. Speci c to the Pakistan site, this study is novel in the local context in that it takes prenatal life as a period of exposure to adversity and aims to collate these ndings with follow-up data over the childhood years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main strengths of our feasibility study were its approach to identify eldigible sample using both facility based and a community based approach, high response rate at recruitment, postpartum follow-up and acquiring varied biological samples, using constructs informed by expert opinion through a delphi technique [34], use of validated instruments used in all other EBLS sites making interesting cross cultural comparisons [3]. Speci c to the Pakistan site, this study is novel in the local context in that it takes prenatal life as a period of exposure to adversity and aims to collate these ndings with follow-up data over the childhood years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, few studies in LMICs have investigated the buffering effect of neighborhood characteristics and interpersonal relationships (e.g., social support, partner support) on p-IPV severity, and intergenerational impacts on birth outcomes (e.g., delivery mode and neonatal conditions). Brown et al (2020) suggested an important focus of research with birth cohorts should be to examine the impact of family or environmental factors and neighborhood disorder on early childhood development [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our ndings underscore the importance of contextual factors related to neighborhood disadvantages and how women can be protected against violence by improving neighborhood safety in future intervention toward ending violence. Future work focusing on a series of protective and promotive neighborhood factors could potentially reduce the trajectory of p-IPV, build resilience for survivors of IPV, and promote a harmonic family and optimal child development [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, social support was strongly associated with partner support via possible interference of in uential family members in the patriarchal system. The positive impact of social support suggests that enhancing social support might be bene cial to improving maternal mental health and reducing the burden of ACE exposure and further investigation should focus on how family, friends and social disadvantage may in uence children's development via violent intimate relationships [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation