1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00046-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What margins should be added to the clinical target volume in radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
103
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regions close to the heart show an increase in error due to uncompensated cardiac motion (Fig. 3a and b) which may become significant for radiation therapy treatment planning in cases where tumors are attached to the aorta (32, 33). Initial results using an additional modeling term synchronized to a patient’s electrocardiogram suggest this motion can be successfully accounted for (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regions close to the heart show an increase in error due to uncompensated cardiac motion (Fig. 3a and b) which may become significant for radiation therapy treatment planning in cases where tumors are attached to the aorta (32, 33). Initial results using an additional modeling term synchronized to a patient’s electrocardiogram suggest this motion can be successfully accounted for (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thoracic and abdominal tumors often exhibit large respiratory motion ranges (Ekberg et al [5], Seppenwoolde et al [25], Keall et al [11]). Intrafractional target motion causes a blurring of the target dose distribution which necessitates the irradiation of additional normal tissue surrounding the tumor volume to achieve full dose coverage of the target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to smaller margins (8 mm) to account for the setup errors only for PTV_4D compared with PTV_3D (1 cm axially and 1.5 cm superior/inferior) which included both—the anticipated motion of the GTV based on population statistics and the margin for setup errors. 20 Interestingly, when the 3DCRT plan was superimposed on PTV_4D, some of the 4D_PTV was not encompassed by the 3DCRT 95% isodose line and dose coverage was more variable than 3D plans (Figure 2). This is likely due to the difference in the anatomical location between the 2 volumes caused by unpredictable trajectory of the tumor during a breathing cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%