2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-016-9680-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What makes a ‘good group’? Exploring the characteristics and performance of undergraduate student groups

Abstract: Group work forms the foundation for much of student learning within higher education, and has many educational, social and professional benefits. This study aimed to explore the determinants of success or failure for undergraduate student teams and to define a 'good group' through considering three aspects of group success: the task, the individuals, and the team. We employed a mixed methodology, combining demographic data with qualitative observations and task and peer evaluation scores. We determined associa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the challenges of peer learning in the context of social media use were remarkably similar to those reported in face to face teaching sessions (Channon et al 2016). Some students enjoyed bouncing ideas off each other and showing their agreement with their peer's answers.…”
Section: Peer Learning and Dealing With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Interestingly, the challenges of peer learning in the context of social media use were remarkably similar to those reported in face to face teaching sessions (Channon et al 2016). Some students enjoyed bouncing ideas off each other and showing their agreement with their peer's answers.…”
Section: Peer Learning and Dealing With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The attainment of learning goals through engagement with collaborative learning tasks can be compromised due to social loafing (lack of contribution from individual students), freeloading (presenting the work of others as one’s own), or social and interpersonal difficulties [38,39,40,41]. For example, Hall et al found that almost half of the students in a veterinary dissection class identified at least one peer who did not contribute productively to their group [38].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group work is an important element across the course, and therefore another key learning outcome for this phase relates to competence in teamwork and team communication. Students are expected to be able to apply models of well-functioning teams (using the Belbin model) 43 and effective communication (using an adaptation of the Calgary-Cambridge system 44 ) to support their group work. As previously mentioned, fundamental to professional identity formation is a process of identifying one's own professional values and priorities, and exploring identity alternatives.…”
Section: Phase 1: the Pre-clinical Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%