2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the state of the art of computer vision-assisted cytology? A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of such approaches is beyond the scope of this paper. We refer the reader to recent comprehensive reviews for more insights on AI and deep learning in computational pathology [26]- [29], with specific reviews for histology [30]- [34] and cytology [35]- [37]. If some ethical issues have appeared in the use of computational pathology in clinical routine [38], most pathologists are in favor of their use [39].…”
Section: Computational Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of such approaches is beyond the scope of this paper. We refer the reader to recent comprehensive reviews for more insights on AI and deep learning in computational pathology [26]- [29], with specific reviews for histology [30]- [34] and cytology [35]- [37]. If some ethical issues have appeared in the use of computational pathology in clinical routine [38], most pathologists are in favor of their use [39].…”
Section: Computational Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic literature review made in middle 2020 with the objective of finding what are the current computer-assisted or artificial intelligence-based approaches in computer vision for the support of quantitative cytology and diagnosis of cancer in cytological exams [14]. The studies analyzed was from the beginning of 2016 to middle of 2020.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated and discussed in [14], one of the most important factors about the training of the models is to avoid biased results. Considering it was split the dataset into three different groups (train, validation, and test set), where each fold:…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations