2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is the Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Erectile Function? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis performed by Glina et al 19 on changes in the quality of sexual life of patients submitted to bariatric surgery, regardless of the technique, showed a substantial improvement in the erectile and sexual function of these patients after the surgical procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis performed by Glina et al 19 on changes in the quality of sexual life of patients submitted to bariatric surgery, regardless of the technique, showed a substantial improvement in the erectile and sexual function of these patients after the surgical procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there exists a meta-analysis that investigate the impact of bariatric surgery on erectile function. Glina et al [33] only use the IIEF score to analysis and their including studies are 7 while our meta-analysis use 2 score indexes and the enrolled studies are 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above articles all used the IIEF as the index to measure the sexual function. However, the articles [33,34]…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on male's sexual function with both IIEF scores and BSFI scores enrolled for comparison. Though a previous meta-analysis, by Glina et al [34], was also performed to assess the effect of bariatric surgery on male's erectile function change, they only discussed the IIEF change and only 7 studies were enrolled for analysis.…”
Section: Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%