What Is the Evidence for Parenting Interventions Offered in a Canadian Community?

Abstract

Background: The evidence supporting interventions offered in the community is often not examined. This study examines the evidence base supporting parenting interventions offered in a Canadian community and, in so doing, illustrates a community assessment mechanism that could be applied routinely for other psychosocial interventions. Methods: An inventory of all manual-guided, group-based parenting interventions offered in a moderate-sized Canadian city was developed by reviewing existing community information guides and contacting key providers of parenting programs. Interventions offered between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2001 were selected for evaluation. Evaluation reports for each intervention were assessed by two independent raters using a modification of the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. Results: Twelve parenting interventions were offered in the study community. Only three (25%) had been evaluated with at least one randomized controlled trial. No evaluation identified an a priori primary outcome measure to assess effectiveness. Multiple statistical testing without including a correction factor limits confidence in the robustness of the small number of positive results. Under-powered evaluations were common. Three interventions had only post-intervention client satisfaction data. The study community used none of the existing parenting interventions that are supported by extensive empirical evidence of efficacy. La traduction du résumé se trouve à la fin de l'article.

The Impact of Behavioural Parent Training on Fathers' Parenting: A Meta-Analysis of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program

“…We identified all trials of Triple P including group, individual, telephone-delivered and self-directed modes, where individuals or groups of parents were randomly allocated to treatment or control. Although previous meta-analyses have included a range of intervention studies (e.g., de Graaf et al, 2008;Nowak & Heinrichs, 2008), we only selected the Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) as they are recognised as the most appropriate means for demonstrating that a program is effective (McLennan & Lavis, 2006;Sanders, 2003). Trials were included if fathers were specifically targeted or where fathers were eligible to participate (programs described as for "parents," for example).…”

UpStart Parent Survey: A New Psychometrically Valid Tool for the Evaluation of Prevention-focused Parenting Programs

“…Currently, most parenting programs have limited evidence of their effectiveness [1, 2], with the majority of research literature limited to intervention programs targeted at high risk children and families (e.g., [3, 4]). Prevention-focused parenting programs (P-FPPs) are key front-line services that help parents learn about child development and healthy parent/child relationships, introduce valuable support networks, and promote parental connection to their community.…”

Exporting a Canadian Parenting Education Program to the Dominican Republic

“…There have been several analyses of the processes and outcomes of Nobody's Perfect in Canada (Vollman, 2001). One of the more structured outcome evaluations suggested some positive impacts (VanderPlaat, 1989); however, there were important methodological limitations to this study (McLennan & Lavis, 2006). Currently, there is a new multi‐site evaluation underway using a quasi‐experimental design to more rigorously examine the outcomes of the Canadian offering of this program (B. Skrypnek, personal communication, June 7, 2006).…”