What is known about the effects of medical tourism in destination and departure countries? A scoping review

Abstract

BackgroundMedical tourism involves patients intentionally leaving their home country to access non-emergency health care services abroad. Growth in the popularity of this practice has resulted in a significant amount of attention being given to it from researchers, policy-makers, and the media. Yet, there has been little effort to systematically synthesize what is known about the effects of this phenomenon. This article presents the findings of a scoping review examining what is known about the effects of medical tourism in destination and departure countries.MethodsDrawing on academic articles, grey literature, and media sources extracted from18 databases, we follow a widely used scoping review protocol to synthesize what is known about the effects of medical tourism in destination and departure countries. The review design has three main stages: (1) identifying the question and relevant literature; (2) selecting the literature; and (3) charting, collating, and summarizing the data.ResultsThe large majority of the 203 sources accepted into the review offer a perspective of medical tourism from the Global North, focusing on the flow of patients from high income nations to lower and middle income countries. This greatly shapes any discussion of the effects of medical tourism on destination and departure countries. Five interrelated themes that characterize existing discussion of the effects of this practice were extracted from the reviewed sources. These themes frame medical tourism as a: (1) user of public resources; (2) solution to health system problems; (3) revenue generating industry; (4) standard of care; and (5) source of inequity. It is observed that what is currently known about the effects of medical tourism is minimal, unreliable, geographically restricted and mostly based on speculation.ConclusionsGiven its positive and negative effects on the health care systems of departure and destination countries, medical tourism is a highly significant and contested phenomenon. This is especially true given its potential to serve as a powerful force for the inequitable delivery of health care services globally. It is recommended that empirical evidence and other data associated with medical tourism be subjected to clear and coherent definitions, including reports focused on the flows of medical tourists and surgery success rates. Additional primary research on the effects of medical tourism is needed if the industry is to develop in a manner that is beneficial to citizens of both departure and destination countries.

Tourism, Health and Income in Malaysia

“…After the bounds test found a long-run relationship, the ARDL model is estimated with the following equation: (4) All the values of p, q, and r are selected based on Schwarz information criterion (SIC). The estimated output of Equation (5) …”

Training for Medical Tourism in Iran

“…Therefore, it is important to consider the possibly powerful potential of medical tourism for the development of a global health education system. 49 Medical tourism recruitment factors include professional human resources from hospitals who have international work records, training courses, being fluent in English, and promoting all aspects of professional human resources. 50,51 The hospitals are suitable for some standards (access to and continuity of treatment, patient evaluation, anesthetic care and drug management), but only adequate for others (patient and family rights, patient care, staff education, and patient education).…”

“…42,61 The overall results of studies suggest that medical tourism training should be developed. 1,11,17,49 …”

Governing new global health-care markets: the case of stem cell treatments

“…As Paolo Blanco, a leading stem cell scientist, puts it in an article in Nature: 'Claiming the right to market products ahead of proof of efficacy can only bring ineffective products to market, degrade medicine and impoverish all except, perhaps, the fortunate sellers.' (Blanco 2013: 255) In common with the global health-care market in general where 'medical tourism' is frequently seen by bioethicists as ethically problematic (Johnston 2010), stem cell consumers are seen to be subject to the exploitative character of the market and restricted in their ability to make informed choices. As Mason puts it: 'Stem cell tourism is undoubtedly a growing menace to vulnerable patients and their care-givers, potentially inflicting physical, psychological and major financial damage at a most difficult time of their lives' (Mason 2010: 684).…”