Trapping Safety Into Rules 2017
DOI: 10.1201/9781315549774-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is It about Checklists? Exploring Safe Work Practices in Surgical Teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 27 Survey of surgical checklists and analysis after their application show that their introduction reduces mortality and morbidity in surgery. 28 - 32 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 27 Survey of surgical checklists and analysis after their application show that their introduction reduces mortality and morbidity in surgery. 28 - 32 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Survey of surgical checklists and analysis after their application show that their introduction reduces mortality and morbidity in surgery. [28][29][30][31][32] The analysis of literature showed that there is a lot of research on operative approaches of surgeons, their expert knowledge and abilities (sensory-motor capabilities and situational awareness), their workload (mental and physical) and workload-caused vulnerability (musculoskeletal disorders and hand dexterity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of procedures remained at an almost constant level for many years, varying depending on the industry, ranging from relatively strong regulations enforced in air transport, to the near absence of formal procedures in medicine [16]. The main regulator of all types of activities was the state, which itself was often the recipient of regulations; for instance, until the 1980s, the railway sectors in Western Europe were practically not separated from state structures [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardisation is often viewed as a purely objective, technical exercise, but this is a misconception 13. However, objective, rationalised, complete and internally consistent a set of standardised procedures might be, their development, interpretation and application are social processes, subject to the context, history, politics and goals of actors in the system 14. In addition, there are inevitably gaps between the imagined world of the procedures and the real world of work,15 and conflicts among competing goals; both must be recognised, negotiated and resolved in action by workers in a community of practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%