1989
DOI: 10.1016/0145-2126(89)90084-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is hybrid acute leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This widely variably incidence range cannot be rationally explained solely on the basis of clinical variability between different population groups. Indeed, this variability along with the lack of consensus as to clinical or biological significance of biphenotypia in acute leukaemia is undoubtedly due to several contributing factors: the use of inconsistent and variable diagnostic criteria, the inevitable (but frequently ignored) subjectiveness of immunophenotypic interpretation, and the lack of a standardized and uniform panel of monclonal antibodies utilized in immunophenotypic analyses (Gale & Ben-Bassat, 1987: Maitreyan & Gale, 1989. The lack of an accepted, standardized, and reproducible method of immunophenotypic analysis and the subjectiveness of flow cytometric interpretation are probably the biggest contributors to the inconsistency of diagnosing biphenotypia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This widely variably incidence range cannot be rationally explained solely on the basis of clinical variability between different population groups. Indeed, this variability along with the lack of consensus as to clinical or biological significance of biphenotypia in acute leukaemia is undoubtedly due to several contributing factors: the use of inconsistent and variable diagnostic criteria, the inevitable (but frequently ignored) subjectiveness of immunophenotypic interpretation, and the lack of a standardized and uniform panel of monclonal antibodies utilized in immunophenotypic analyses (Gale & Ben-Bassat, 1987: Maitreyan & Gale, 1989. The lack of an accepted, standardized, and reproducible method of immunophenotypic analysis and the subjectiveness of flow cytometric interpretation are probably the biggest contributors to the inconsistency of diagnosing biphenotypia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clonality, by means of DNA content, appears reasonable with respect to the granulocytes and monocytes, due to the findings of DNA hyperdiploid granulocytes in a few patients; however, DNA hypodiploid "lymphocytes" might represent small blasts or stem cells of unknown origin developed by genetic instability [18,19]. A link to hybrid leukemia [12,44] may also be possible. Another possibility is that these cells could represent lymphoid stem cells that could result in subsequent transformation to acute lymphoblastic leukemia [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%