2017
DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2017.1335847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is behind the epidemiological difference between community-acquired and health-care associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HA infections of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were first reported in the 1960s [ 307 ], but rarely affected non-hospitalised healthy people and failed to spread efficiently within the community. This was generally attributed to the fitness cost imposed upon HA-MRSA through acquisition of antibiotic resistance elements [ 308 ], and is consistent with studies that reported HA-MRSA being generally more drug-resistant [ 305 , 309 ] and have reduced fitness and virulence [ 310 ] than CA-MRSA. Nevertheless, HA-MRSA clones remain a major cause of nosocomial infections globally [ 307 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…HA infections of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were first reported in the 1960s [ 307 ], but rarely affected non-hospitalised healthy people and failed to spread efficiently within the community. This was generally attributed to the fitness cost imposed upon HA-MRSA through acquisition of antibiotic resistance elements [ 308 ], and is consistent with studies that reported HA-MRSA being generally more drug-resistant [ 305 , 309 ] and have reduced fitness and virulence [ 310 ] than CA-MRSA. Nevertheless, HA-MRSA clones remain a major cause of nosocomial infections globally [ 307 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the last decade, several papers describing the isolation, biological and genomic characterization of S. aureus bacteriophages have been published [9,11,33]. As bacteriophages tend to be more specific than antibiotics [4] and since properties of pathogenic strains of MRSA can differ based on a variety of factors [34,35,36], there is a tendency to focus on strains and phages obtained locally [8,10,37]. So far, there is a lack of information on the bacteriophages active against clinical isolates from Gdansk region, Poland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CA-MRSA strains vary from HA-MRSA bacteria in several ways, including the formation of Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL), high-level sensitivity to non β-lactam antibiotics, and carriage of staphylococcal chromosomal cassette (SCCmec) types IV and V 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%