2002
DOI: 10.1080/02687030244000185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is aphasia? Results of an international survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
60
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference may have been due to the fact that Mavis's participants were patients and visitors at a neurology ward and so were more likely to have exposure. It is unclear why the level of public awareness of aphasia was higher in this study than the earlier studies on public awareness of aphasia, other than the more recent Patterson et al, Similar to the awareness results, the percentage of participants who had knowledge of aphasia was higher (as indicated by a score of 50% or above) than previously published studies (Patterson et al, 5.7%, McCann et al 2012: 1.5%;Simmons-Mackie et al 2002: 5.4%; Code et al2001: 5%). Comparisons of knowledge levels could not be made with the current study and the study by Mavis (2007) or Flynn et al, (2009) as, while knowledge was explored in these studies, an overall knowledge score was not calculated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This difference may have been due to the fact that Mavis's participants were patients and visitors at a neurology ward and so were more likely to have exposure. It is unclear why the level of public awareness of aphasia was higher in this study than the earlier studies on public awareness of aphasia, other than the more recent Patterson et al, Similar to the awareness results, the percentage of participants who had knowledge of aphasia was higher (as indicated by a score of 50% or above) than previously published studies (Patterson et al, 5.7%, McCann et al 2012: 1.5%;Simmons-Mackie et al 2002: 5.4%; Code et al2001: 5%). Comparisons of knowledge levels could not be made with the current study and the study by Mavis (2007) or Flynn et al, (2009) as, while knowledge was explored in these studies, an overall knowledge score was not calculated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…These questions usually required the participant to select from a list of causes and characteristics that were most commonly associated with aphasia. It is important to distinguish between awareness and knowledge since they are not the same, as can be seen from the scores in these aphasia surveys where people's awareness of a condition was routinely higher than their knowledge (Code, et al, 2001;Flynn, et al, 2009;Mavis, 2007;McCann, et al, 2013;Patterson, et al, 2015;Simmons-Mackie, et al, 2002).…”
Section: Right Hemisphere Communication Disorder (Rhcd) Is a Communicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations