What is a ‘good’ job? Modelling job quality for blue collar workers

Abstract

This paper proposes a model of job quality, developed from interviews with blue collar workers: bus drivers, manufacturing operatives and cleaners (n=80). The model distinguishes between core features, important for almost all workers, and 'job fit' features, important to some but not others, or where individuals might have different preferences. Core job features found important for almost all interviewees included job security, personal safety, and having enough pay to meet their needs. 'Job fit' features included autonomy and the opportunity to form close relationships. These showed more variation between participants; priorities were influenced by family commitments, stage of life and personal preference. The resulting theoretical perspective indicates the features necessary for a job to be considered 'good' by the person doing it, whilst not adversely affecting their health. The model should have utility as a basis for measuring and improving job quality and the laudable goal of creating 'good jobs'. KeywordsJob quality; good jobs; good work; health; bus drivers Practitioner summaryGood work can contribute positively to health and wellbeing, but there is a lack of agreement regarding the concept of a 'good' job. A model of job quality has been constructed based on semi-structured worker interviews (n=80). The model emphasises the need to take into account variation between individuals in their preferred work characteristics.

Job design, employment practices and well-being: a systematic review of intervention studies

“…Although different job characteristics may be more or less important for well-being depending on context and individual circumstances (Jones, Haslam, and Haslam 2017), there is consistent evidence from observational studies (i.e. nonintervention studies that assess naturally occurring levels of job characteristics) to indicate that job characteristics need to be compatible with other organisational processes and sub-systems (Cherns 1987;Clegg 2000;Davis et al 2013).…”

“…There is long-standing and continuing interest in psychological well-being and the quality of jobs in work organisations (Grote and Guest 2017;Jones, Haslam, and Haslam 2017). The provision of high quality jobs is seen as a key lever in improving well-being in political circles (All Parliamentary Work Group on Wellbeing Economics 2014) and across a broad range of stakeholders including the general public, trades union officials, employment specialists, managers and students (Daniels et al 2016).…”

“…Moreover, the design of high quality jobs is relevant to a broad range of occupations (Grote and Guest 2017), and so with modifications to specific contexts where appropriate (e.g. Jones, Haslam, and Haslam 2017), job redesign has the potential to enhance well-being across the working population through improvements to the quality of jobs (Cousins et al 2004). Waterman (1993) considers that psychological well-being has two major components: subjective well-being and eudaimonic well-being.…”

Ergonomics at 60: mature, thriving and still leading the way

“…There is also a need for research addressing the challenge identified by Straker and Mathiassen (2009): increasing physical activity through the way work is organised and done. We need to understand how to design jobs that are productive, safe and fulfilling, whilst also being good for health, integrating rather than eliminating physical activity and mental demands (Jones, Haslam, and Haslam 2016). Ergonomics endeavours to publish high quality papers, reporting research that makes a substantive contribution to contemporary science and articles which have an impact on ergonomics practice or debate.…”

Transforming employment support for individuals with health conditions?: 3Cs to the aid of the Work, Health and Disability Green Paper

“…That idea of 'good work' needs to be self-defined by individuals themselves so that job roles are tailored to their specific needs (both health and wider) and interests, alongside a set of employment characteristics that are shared more generally across all individuals (e.g. contractual and income security, income adequacy, choice and agency, interest, safety, respect, opportunities for development) (Ritter and Anker, 2002;Warhurst et al, 2012;Jones et al, 2017).…”