Job design, employment practices and well-being: a systematic review of intervention studies

Abstract

There is inconsistent evidence that deliberate attempts to improve job design realise improvements in well-being. We investigated the role of other employment practices, either as instruments for job redesign or as instruments that augment job redesign. Our primary outcome was well-being. Where studies also assessed performance, we considered performance as an outcome. We reviewed 33 intervention studies. We found that well-being and performance may be improved by: training workers to improve their own jobs; training coupled with job redesign; and system wide approaches that simultaneously enhance job design and a range of other employment practices. We found insufficient evidence to make any firm conclusions concerning the effects of training managers in job redesign and that participatory approaches to improving job design have mixed effects. Successful implementation of interventions was associated with worker involvement and engagement with interventions, managerial commitment to interventions and integration of interventions with other organisational systems. Practitioner Summary: Improvements in well-being and performance may be associated with system-wide approaches that simultaneously enhance job design, introduce a range of other employment practices and focus on worker welfare. Training may have a role in initiating job redesign or augmenting the effects of job design on well-being.

Mindful Emotion Regulation, Savouring and Proactive Behaviour: The Role of Supervisor Justice

“…Organisational level interventions (e.g., Nielsen & Abildgaard, ; Nielsen, Taris, & Cox, ) would have been an alternative approach, but given the unique organisational and economic circumstances, they were not feasible. Furthermore, past systematic reviews and meta‐analysis demonstrate that organisational level interventions have mixed results, and that cognitive‐emotional interventions at the individual level showed the strongest effects sizes (Daniels, Gedikli, Watson, Semkina, & Vaughn, ; Richardson & Rothstein, ). Our research demonstrated that individual level interventions can be effective under certain conditions.…”

The value of job crafting for work engagement, task performance, and career satisfaction: longitudinal and quasi-experimental evidence

“…Such initiatives are important to create engaging work environments and ensure that current employees are all able to create the circumstances that allow them to thrive at work. Employee involvement in such interventions is key, as previous studies have shown that individual level crafting interventions appear to be more successful than collective, participatory job redesign interventions (Daniels, Gedikli, Watson, Semkina, & Vaughn, 2017).…”

Challenging the Universality of Job Resources: Why, When, and For Whom Are They Beneficial?

“…There is also considerable evidence for interaction effects where job resources buffer the adverse effects of job demands on strain and the combination of job resources and job demands boosts work engagement (e.g., Bakker, Hakanen, Demerouti, & Xanthopoulou, , ; Hakanen, Bakker, & Demerouti, ). In addition, longitudinal and intervention studies show that increasing job resources can lead to these desirable outcomes (e.g., Daniels, Gedikli, Watson, Semkina, & Vaughn, ; Holman & Axtell, ; Van Wingerden, Bakker, & Derks, ).…”