2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02715881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies onDrosophila melanogaster taught us?

Abstract: A series of laboratory selection experiments on Drosophila melanogaster over the past two decades has provided insights into the specifics of life-history tradeoffs in the species and greatly refined our understanding of how ecology and genetics interact in life-history evolution. Much of what has been learnt from these studies about the subtlety of the microevolutionary process also has significant implications for experimental design and inference in organismal biology beyond life-history evolution, as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
152
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 283 publications
8
152
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous studies differed in methodology, including nutrition, temperature, selection regime (duration of exposure to stress, number of generations) and larval rearing density. Differences in these environmental factors result in varying patterns of responses to selection in life history traits (Prasad and Joshi, 2003), and could be responsible for the apparent inconsistent responses of larval developmental time to desiccation selection. Moreover, we assayed eclosion at hourly intervals and were able to detect a ~5-6·h difference in developmental time between selected and control flies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous studies differed in methodology, including nutrition, temperature, selection regime (duration of exposure to stress, number of generations) and larval rearing density. Differences in these environmental factors result in varying patterns of responses to selection in life history traits (Prasad and Joshi, 2003), and could be responsible for the apparent inconsistent responses of larval developmental time to desiccation selection. Moreover, we assayed eclosion at hourly intervals and were able to detect a ~5-6·h difference in developmental time between selected and control flies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the unit of replication in any study addressing evolutionary questions should be population, not individuals. Therefore, it is not possible to rule out that the changes in circadian phenotypes reported in early selection studies may be a consequence of genetic drift or inbreeding that the populations may have undergone (reviewed by Prasad and Joshi, 2003;David et al, 2005;Miller and Hedrick, 2001).…”
Section: Evolution Of Circadian Clocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nature, insect populations including those of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster are subjected to directional selection for faster development because they inhabit ephemeral habitats such as rotting fruits (Prasad and Joshi, 2003). Several studies on life history traits in different model organisms, including Drosophila, led to the development of life history theory, which posits that natural selection enhances organismal fitness, and that the trait combinations under selection are constrained by trade-offs (see Prasad and Joshi, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on life history traits in different model organisms, including Drosophila, led to the development of life history theory, which posits that natural selection enhances organismal fitness, and that the trait combinations under selection are constrained by trade-offs (see Prasad and Joshi, 2003). Trade-offs are observed at phenotypic as well as genetic levels; hence assessment of trade-offs is necessary at both levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%