What do stakeholders consider the key issues affecting the quality of foodservice provision for long‐stay patients?

Abstract

This study aimed to elicit concerns of key stakeholders regarding foodservice provision for long-stay hospital patients. Seventeen focus groups and four individual interviews were conducted involving six stakeholder groups: dietitians, nutrition assistants, patients, nurses, foodservice assistants and foodservice managers. Ninety-eight participants (20 male, 78 female) were recruited from public and private hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Each of the focus groups and individual interviews was conducted in a hospital setting where free and open discussions could be digitally recorded. Transcripts were prepared from the digital recordings and QSR Nvivo 2.0 qualitative analysis software (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia) was used to code the transcripts prior to content and thematic analysis. Themes were identified by relative frequency in the discussion, number of issues raised within each theme and the importance placed on the issues raised. Five major themes emerged from 37 discussion topics: the foodservice system, menu variety, preparation to eat and feeding assistance, packaging and portion size. Participants were particularly concerned about the increased packaging of food products, perceived lack of meal set up and feeding assistance, limited menu variety especially when considering longer stay hospital inpatients, and the increased use of cook-chill operations. These findings lend themselves well to testing in a wider sphere via quantitative means in a proposed national survey. The results of this survey may produce a position on the main barriers to effective foodservice provision for long-stay patients in the Australian context, and enable identification of practical solutions.

Food advertisements containing ‘scientific’ and ‘lay person’ keywords: Responses from a sample of female Australian consumers

“…The focus group's recordings were transcribed verbatim and accuracy of the transcripts was verified through reviewing two of the four typed transcripts against the digital recording. Two coders examined the transcripts using content and thematic analysis 23,24 . Analysis was led by a search for types of responses and, in particular, reference to ‘scientific’ and ‘lay person’ keywords in nutrition messages.…”

“…The primary coder (AM) carried out initial qualitative analysis to develop categories of main themes representing all forms of responses. Subcategories were created from these to account for variation within themes 24,25 . Secondary coders (HP and LM) similarly coded the data, and differences were identified and debated to reach consensus 26,27 .…”

Food service research: An integrated approach

“…Focus groups with stakeholders elicited a range of themes such as patient care, patient satisfaction, meal time and foodservice staff (Hartwell et al, 2006). A deeper probing resulted in identification of particular issues such as food service system, menu variety, feeding assistance, excessive packaging and portion size (Walton et al, 2006). A study on consumer attitudes towards the use of food service systems in food preparation was based on the 'Food Neophobia' scale.…”

Rehabilitation inpatients are not meeting their energy and protein needs

“…It is investigating factors that impact on food intakes by inpatients, as well as attempting to determine priority opportunities for ongoing improvement. 22 The qualitative findings will be reported in a future publication and this paper reports some of the quantitative findings. This study aimed:…”