2002
DOI: 10.1075/sfsl.48.04con
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(What) do noun class markers mean?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Carstens (1991Carstens ( , 1993Carstens ( , 2000Carstens ( , 2005 and Contini-Morava (2002), every noun root in Swahili is a member of one of six genders 3 , which are traditionally labeled with numbers. Each noun root takes one set of agreements for singular marking and a different set for plural marking.…”
Section: The Swahili Gender System 231 Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on Carstens (1991Carstens ( , 1993Carstens ( , 2000Carstens ( , 2005 and Contini-Morava (2002), every noun root in Swahili is a member of one of six genders 3 , which are traditionally labeled with numbers. Each noun root takes one set of agreements for singular marking and a different set for plural marking.…”
Section: The Swahili Gender System 231 Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view is reflected in textbooks for Swahili, which often provide generalizations for each gender but note that a large number of nouns fail to fit the pattern (see, e.g., Wilson 1985). Contini-Morava's (2002) careful analysis of the Swahili gender system demonstrates that some nouns adhere to a few central semantic principles and others are more "peripheral," related to the center through chains of metaphor or metonymy that may not be readily apparent. For instance, one of the central semantic properties of gender 3/4 is trees; the words for 'tree' (mti) and 'banana tree' (mgomba) are in this gender.…”
Section: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the last few decades, studies on Niger-Congo nominal classification systems have increasingly proposed, generally using cognitive semantics as a basis (Breedveld 1995, Contini-Morava 1997, 2002, P. J. Denny & Creider 1986, Moxley 1998, Spitulnik 1989, that these noun class systems are overt manifestations of speakers" mental categorisation of their experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%