2008
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980007001292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do babies eat? Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess the diets of infants aged 6 months

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for assessing nutrient intakes in 6-month-old infants. Design and setting: The FFQ was developed to assess the diets of infants born to women in the Southampton Women's Survey (SWS), a population-based survey of young women and their offspring. The energy and nutrient intakes obtained from an interviewer-administered FFQ were compared with those obtained from a 4-day weighed diary. Subjects and methods: A sub-sample of 50 infa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst there is concern that such questionnaires can be prone to measurement error, they have been shown to identify similar patterns of diet to dietary records (17,18) , and pattern scores determined using different dietary methods are highly correlated (5,19) . In separate validation studies we have also established that nutrient intakes assessed using these FFQ at 6 and 12 months of age are comparable with nutrient intakes assessed using weighed records (11,12) . Second, the mothers of participants were a subset of the overall SWS cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst there is concern that such questionnaires can be prone to measurement error, they have been shown to identify similar patterns of diet to dietary records (17,18) , and pattern scores determined using different dietary methods are highly correlated (5,19) . In separate validation studies we have also established that nutrient intakes assessed using these FFQ at 6 and 12 months of age are comparable with nutrient intakes assessed using weighed records (11,12) . Second, the mothers of participants were a subset of the overall SWS cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Diet was assessed at 6 months and at 12 months using administered FFQ that were developed for the SWS (11,12) . Trained research nurses administered the FFQ.…”
Section: Dietary Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulgaria (Petrova, 1998) Ten publications assessed dietary intakes at different time points in infants and young children participating in cohort studies, i.e. the German Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) study (Hilbig, 2005;Schwartz et al, 2010), the UK Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) (Noble and Emmett, 2001;Emmett et al, 2002;Rogers et al, 2003;Noble and Emmett, 2006), the UK Southampton Women's Survey (SWS) (Marriott et al, 2008;Marriott et al, 2009), and the Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention (DIPP) study (Kyttälä et al, 2008;Kyttälä et al, 2010).…”
Section: Dietary Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 50 % of the British infants (P50: 6.9 mg per day) studied by Marriott et al (2008) and around 25 % of Dutch infants (P25: 8.3 mg per day) (de Boer et al, 2006) had intakes below the AI.…”
Section: Ironmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFQ are particularly useful for establishing generalised patterns of food intake but with the exception of a few recent studies (2)(3)(4)(5) have not been widely used to assess dietary intakes of infants and/or young children. We have previously described an FFQ for dietary assessment at 6 months of age (6) . In the present paper, we evaluate the use of an interviewer-administered FFQ to assess the diets of infants aged 12 months, for use in a large population survey (the Southampton Women's Survey (SWS)), that would describe dietary patterns, and would rank infants in terms of their nutrient intake.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%