2004
DOI: 10.2307/4135195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Counts as the demos? Some Notes on the Relationship between the Jury and "The People" in Classical Athens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 Cf. Pasquino (2010) and Lanni (2010), on judicial review, and, for example, Hansen (1974); (1991) 150-55, 300-04; Ober (1989) 22-23; Ostwald (1989); Todd (1993) 170, 298-99; Blanshard (2004); Pecorella Longo (2004); Cammack (2012) for the debate on the place of sovereignty in Athens.…”
Section: Iiii Dem 2093-94mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Cf. Pasquino (2010) and Lanni (2010), on judicial review, and, for example, Hansen (1974); (1991) 150-55, 300-04; Ober (1989) 22-23; Ostwald (1989); Todd (1993) 170, 298-99; Blanshard (2004); Pecorella Longo (2004); Cammack (2012) for the debate on the place of sovereignty in Athens.…”
Section: Iiii Dem 2093-94mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knights 40 with Russo (1994) 79-80;Dover (1972) 93. 44 On the extent to which Athenian juries could be identified rhetorically with the demos, see Blanshard (2004). 45 An anonymous reader for CCJ suggests to me that 'audience address potentially changes the potential of representation: the audience can see itself as itself in the "you"'.…”
Section: Comic and Tragic Means Of Portraying The Demosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And it was surely no coincidence that 6,000 was also the standard number for a quorum in the assembly. 67 For the suggestion that it really was no more than a rhetorical trope, albeit a powerful one, see, for example, Blanshard (2004); Wilson (2004) 212, n. 4.…”
Section: Athenian Leviathanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 While Blanshard (2004) maintains that Athenian texts generally recognize a discernible 'gap between demos and jury', he also suggests that sometimes in forensic oratory the 'transformative power of rhetoric' narrowed this 'gap' to the point where the two agencies became entirely conflated. Even if one believes, as I do, that jurors always represented the Demos-State, it was obviously rhetorically convenient at times for litigants to address the jurors collectively as idiôtai, as individuals who lived normal 'civilian' lives outside the courtroom (for example, Dem.…”
Section: Athenian Leviathanmentioning
confidence: 99%