2022
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What common‐garden experiments tell us about climate responses in plants

Abstract: 1. Common garden experiments are indoor or outdoor plantings of species or populations collected from multiple distinct geographic locations, grown together under shared conditions. These experiments examine a range of questions for theory and application using a variety of methods for analysis. The eight papers of this special feature comprise a cross section of contemporary approaches, summarized and synthesized here by what they tell us about the relationships between climate-related trait spectra and fitne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common garden experiments evaluating populations from a species natural range are particularly useful to understand intraspecific variation and quantify both genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity (Schwinning et al, 2022). When grown in these common environments, the association between fitness‐related traits and home environment is interpreted as evidence of genetic adaptation to climate (Davis et al, 2005; Etterson et al, 2016; Kawecki & Ebert, 2004; Lortie & Hierro, 2022; Schwinning et al, 2022), even though neutral evolutionary processes, sometimes related to postglacial recolonization routes, can result in neutral genetic variation associated with environmental gradients (e.g., López‐Goldar et al, 2019). When populations are tested in several common gardens, their phenotypic plasticity can also be quantified (e.g., Schwinning et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common garden experiments evaluating populations from a species natural range are particularly useful to understand intraspecific variation and quantify both genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity (Schwinning et al, 2022). When grown in these common environments, the association between fitness‐related traits and home environment is interpreted as evidence of genetic adaptation to climate (Davis et al, 2005; Etterson et al, 2016; Kawecki & Ebert, 2004; Lortie & Hierro, 2022; Schwinning et al, 2022), even though neutral evolutionary processes, sometimes related to postglacial recolonization routes, can result in neutral genetic variation associated with environmental gradients (e.g., López‐Goldar et al, 2019). When populations are tested in several common gardens, their phenotypic plasticity can also be quantified (e.g., Schwinning et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species composition was surveyed in a reciprocal common garden experiment after four and 11 years. A reciprocal transplant garden provides a powerful resource to demonstrate the association between phenotypic variation and environmental gradient, local adaptation across regions, and the performance of ecotypes in native and foreign habitats (Johnson et al, 2021; Schwinning et al, 2022). We illustrate our hypotheses schematically (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common garden and reciprocal transplant experiments, especially when the maternal identity of propagation materials is maintained throughout the experiment, are the optimal way to test how climate and other environmental conditions interact with the genetic background of individuals and population to affect heritable traits and phenotypic plasticity (Schwinning et al, 2022). Such genecological studies undertaken for tree species have far outpaced those focused upon shorter-lived species (Aitken and Bemmels, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%