2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the PANSS items most related with global improvements in patients with schizophrenia? Toward a reduced version of the PANSS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Comparatively less is known about the impact of symptomatic improvement in specific domains and their relationship with changes in overall illness severity ratings. 16 Both of these investigations were restricted to an acutely ill inpatient sample and had relatively short follow-up, limiting generalizability of the findings. 15 Change in positive symptoms was the strongest predictor of change in overall illness severity, with relatively smaller yet independent contributions made by change in negative and agitation symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Comparatively less is known about the impact of symptomatic improvement in specific domains and their relationship with changes in overall illness severity ratings. 16 Both of these investigations were restricted to an acutely ill inpatient sample and had relatively short follow-up, limiting generalizability of the findings. 15 Change in positive symptoms was the strongest predictor of change in overall illness severity, with relatively smaller yet independent contributions made by change in negative and agitation symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact there were many attempts to reduce the PANSS in order to obtain clusters of items which could represent valid and reliable factors to better measure severity of illness (Ortiz et al, 2014) or predict treatment response, (Ortiz et al, 2014). Of note is the fact Item Response Theory , and not FA, has been proposed as the method of choice for such endeavor {Levine, 2011 #454 and a recent study based on this method which used the PANSS-6 (Ostergaard et al, 2018) (composed by delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, blunted affect, passive/ apathetic social withdrawal and lack of spontaneity) proved to be a valid and sensible instrument for the evaluation of severity , remission and efficacy in patients with TRS of phase 2E of the CATIE study (McEvoy et al, 2006).…”
Section: 3) Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%