2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the drivers of beef sensory quality using metadata of intramuscular connective tissue, fatty acids and muscle fiber characteristics?

Abstract: What are the drivers of beef sensory quality using metadata of intramuscular connective tissue, fatty acids and muscle fiber characteristics?,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four authors showed a positive relationship between MUFAs (Garmyn et al, 2011;Hunt et al, 2016;Hwang & Joo, 2017;Listrat et al, 2020), SFAs (Cho et al, 2005;Hunt et al, 2016;Hwang & Joo, 2016;Listrat et al, 2020), and the earlier-mentioned sensory attributes of meat while five studies showed a negative relationship between PUFAs and the earlier-mentioned sensory attributes (Cho et al, 2005;Garmyn et al, 2011;Hwang & Joo, 2016, 2017Listrat et al, 2020). Listrat et al (2020) stated that these contradicting results are due to the use of different cooking methods, animal types, cooking temperatures, or differences in consumer habits and preferences. Further research is required to determine whether there is a casual relationship between increased end-point temperatures of meat, its fatty acids, and final palatability.…”
Section: Fatty Acid Compositionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four authors showed a positive relationship between MUFAs (Garmyn et al, 2011;Hunt et al, 2016;Hwang & Joo, 2017;Listrat et al, 2020), SFAs (Cho et al, 2005;Hunt et al, 2016;Hwang & Joo, 2016;Listrat et al, 2020), and the earlier-mentioned sensory attributes of meat while five studies showed a negative relationship between PUFAs and the earlier-mentioned sensory attributes (Cho et al, 2005;Garmyn et al, 2011;Hwang & Joo, 2016, 2017Listrat et al, 2020). Listrat et al (2020) stated that these contradicting results are due to the use of different cooking methods, animal types, cooking temperatures, or differences in consumer habits and preferences. Further research is required to determine whether there is a casual relationship between increased end-point temperatures of meat, its fatty acids, and final palatability.…”
Section: Fatty Acid Compositionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a result, it has become increasingly popular for researchers to investigate the manipulation of the fatty acid composition of meat (e.g., manipulating the polyunsaturated fat to saturated fat ratio, P:S toward a more favorable omega‐6 to omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratio, n‐6:n‐3) (Alfaia et al., 2010; Wood et al., 2003). Furthermore, the knowledge of meat fatty acid composition has become of growing importance for consumers (Listrat et al., 2020), since meat is a major source of fat in many individual's diets, and in particular saturated fatty acids (SFAs), which is associated with cancers and cardiovascular diseases (Listrat et al., 2020; Wood et al., 2003).…”
Section: Effect Of Degree Of Doneness On the Physicochemical Properti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat (IMF) of beef has received considerable interest in light with the association and implication of beef fats to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD; Briggs et al., 2017 ), and its positive relationship to the sensory characteristic of the beef meat such as aroma, flavor, juiciness, and tenderness ( Listrat et al, 2020 ). The amount of beef IMF and the composition of the fatty acids have been reported to be impacted by the cattle breed or genetic variation ( Pitchford et al, 2002 ), fat deposition ( Hwang and Joo, 2016 ), and alterations in the feeding strategy either by grass or grain feeding ( Hwang and Joo, 2017 ; Van Elswyk and McNeill, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insoluble collagen was positively associated with juiciness and the soluble collagen negatively with juiciness. The insoluble collagen and soluble collagen were negatively associated with the flavor [46] . Compared with the control, the soluble collagen content of the sample treated with ultrasound for 500 W/30 min increased by 170.6%, the content of insoluble collagen and total collagen decreased by 37.0% and 9.09%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%