What a Generalist Tutor Can Do: A Short Lesson from a Tutoring Session

Abstract

In parallel to the unique history of writing instruction, Canadian writing specialists have drawn on different theories and principles from the U.S. literature in building their writing studies scholarship (Giltrow, 2016; Graves, 1993; Graves & Graves, 2006; Paré, 2017; Smith, 2006). This is evident in the “Statement on Writing Centres and Staffing” published by the Canadian Journal for Studies of Discourse and Writing (Graves, 2016). As a doctoral student researching U.S.-based writing centres from day one of graduate school, one striking cross-border difference I find was the statement’s clear recommendation that writing centres are fundamentally teaching units in which students learn to write in their disciplines. In American writing centre theory, peer tutoring is the basis of writing centre philosophy, with some claiming that the tutor’s unfamiliarity of the tutee’s discipline enhances the non-hierarchical learning environment (Bruffee, 1995; North, 1984; Pemberton, 1995).

What are the Perceptions of STEM Students Regarding Writing Practices in a University in Kazakhstan?

“…Contrary to this finding, Okuda's (2017) research focuses on generalist tutors and their effectiveness during the writing center sessions. The author conducted an observation of a writing consultation and interviewed both a tutor and a tutee after the session.…”

Writing and Research Across the Globe: An Innovative North-North-South-South Collaboration

“…Writing Centre Web Page Word ClustersWhen it came time to think about what recommendations I would make as a result of the benchmarking study, I thought back to the literature on writing centres and some of the struggles that they have(Pare, 2017; Monty, 2016;Okuda, 2017;Klostermann, 2017); some of the recommendations writing scholars make; and my experiences as a writing consultant in my own institution. From there, I came up with three general areas that could be considered for our collaborations.…”