2018
DOI: 10.7146/politik.v21i1.106144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whack-a-mole: En undersøgelse af falske nyheder og deres økosystemer

Abstract: Vi argumenterer for, at falske nyheder skal forstås og undersøges empirisk i deres natur- lige habitat. Falske nyheder bør ikke blot håndteres som et spil whack-a-mole, hvor formålet er at slå det falske ned, hver gang det dukker op, som var det et muldvarpehoved i en spilleautomat, men derimod at forsøge at forstå de gange, muldvarpen graver.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Now the method has evolved into its own research method that explores and represents socio technical issues and makes complex scientific debates readable for a larger public through extensive controversy maps (Venturini et al, 2015a). The field has been extensively developed and is applied in many cross disciplinary projects investigating topics such as obesity research (Jensen & Louise, 2018), fake news (Bach et al, 2018), climate negotiations, and climate diplomacy (Venturini et al, 2014(Venturini et al, , 2015b to name but a few. The aim of using mapping controversy in our mixed-method approach is to contribute with an extensive and comprehensive explanation of the configuration of the public value literature.…”
Section: Mapping Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now the method has evolved into its own research method that explores and represents socio technical issues and makes complex scientific debates readable for a larger public through extensive controversy maps (Venturini et al, 2015a). The field has been extensively developed and is applied in many cross disciplinary projects investigating topics such as obesity research (Jensen & Louise, 2018), fake news (Bach et al, 2018), climate negotiations, and climate diplomacy (Venturini et al, 2014(Venturini et al, , 2015b to name but a few. The aim of using mapping controversy in our mixed-method approach is to contribute with an extensive and comprehensive explanation of the configuration of the public value literature.…”
Section: Mapping Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The five projects we refer to here are the following: obesity research (Elgaard Jensen et al 2018;Munk et al 2016), ASSET (Birkbak, Madsen, and Munk 2020), Aalborg school reform (Madsen and Munk 2019), the Royal Danish Theatre (Munk, Madsen, and Jacomy 2019), and fake news (Bach et al 2018;Bounegru et al 2017). Our thinking about PDD has also developed in dialogue with colleagues doing similar kinds of work, in particular Morten Misfeldt and collaborators' work on datafication of learning goals in Danish primary schools (Misfeldt et al 2018).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problemet er derimod, at fake news ikke udfordrer os. Problemet med fake news er grundlaeggende, at de bekraefter os i de opfattelser, som vi har på forhånd, og dermed bliver vi i sidste ende begraenset af den allerede eksisterende taenkning.Diskussioner af begrebet "fake news" har spillet en stigende rolle i 2010'erne, og fik en saerlig fremtraedende plads omkring det amerikanske praesidentvalg i 2016, hvor praesidentkandidat Donald Trump gjorde det til sit eget begreb i en polemik imod etablerede medier, efter at disse medier gennem laengere tid havde kritiseret ham for ikke at have et trovaerdigt forhold til sandheden og derfor havde indført en raekke nye formater for faktatjek (Bach et al 2018).Af åbenlyse grunde er dette et faenomen, der har interesseret den…”
unclassified
“…Diskussioner af begrebet "fake news" har spillet en stigende rolle i 2010'erne, og fik en saerlig fremtraedende plads omkring det amerikanske praesidentvalg i 2016, hvor praesidentkandidat Donald Trump gjorde det til sit eget begreb i en polemik imod etablerede medier, efter at disse medier gennem laengere tid havde kritiseret ham for ikke at have et trovaerdigt forhold til sandheden og derfor havde indført en raekke nye formater for faktatjek (Bach et al 2018).…”
unclassified