Making &Amp; Doing 2021
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11310.003.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory Data Design: Acting in a Digital World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of digital anthropology scholarship include explorations of online communities (Wilson and Peterson 2002;Boellstorff 2008), digital media (Coleman 2010), domestic life, mobile phones, social media, politics, blockchain, and labor (Horst and Miller 2012; Geismar and Knox 2021). The impact of digital anthropology on our methods is also notably demonstrated in publications on digital ethnography and netnography, ethno-mining, social network analysis, text mining and natural language processing, machine learning, computer vision, participatory data design, and computational anthropology (Pink et al 2015;Kozinets 2009;Gluesing, Riopelle, and Danowski 2014;Jemielniak 2020;Munk and Winthereik 2022;Munk 2022;Munk, Olesen, and Jacomy 2022;Anderson et al 2009;Jensen et al 2021).…”
Section: Digital Anthropology and Its Relevance To Business Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Examples of digital anthropology scholarship include explorations of online communities (Wilson and Peterson 2002;Boellstorff 2008), digital media (Coleman 2010), domestic life, mobile phones, social media, politics, blockchain, and labor (Horst and Miller 2012; Geismar and Knox 2021). The impact of digital anthropology on our methods is also notably demonstrated in publications on digital ethnography and netnography, ethno-mining, social network analysis, text mining and natural language processing, machine learning, computer vision, participatory data design, and computational anthropology (Pink et al 2015;Kozinets 2009;Gluesing, Riopelle, and Danowski 2014;Jemielniak 2020;Munk and Winthereik 2022;Munk 2022;Munk, Olesen, and Jacomy 2022;Anderson et al 2009;Jensen et al 2021).…”
Section: Digital Anthropology and Its Relevance To Business Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Throughout the workshops, we have shifted roles between facilitators, local organisers, participants, and ethnographers as both events have been devised, planned, conducted, documented, and analysed by the authors of this article. Leaning onto collaborative fieldwork (Lassiter 2005; Estalella and Sánchez 2018), the workshops have drawn inspiration from shortterm, participatory, and open-ended formats such as data sprints (Munk et al 2019;Jensen et al 2021). We conceive both workshops as experimentsencounters under unusual temporal, technological, and organisational constraints (Lezaun et al 2013).…”
Section: Par Ticipant Obser Vation In Videoconf Erence Wor Kshopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper will frame the design as the UB toolkit as the result of such socio-technical processes where distinct interests and historical trajectories came to matter. Taking inspiration from literature such as ''participatory design'' (Brandt et al, 2012;Simonsen and Robertson, 2013) and ''participatory data design'' (Jensen et al, 2021), we will describe which actors we invited into formulate design specifications and discuss how this ultimately shaped the technical features of the tool and thus the empirical practices it affords. Drawing on work in ''Design Justice'' (Costanza-Chock, 2020), ''Data Action'' (Williams, 2020), and''Data Feminism'' (D'Ignazio andKlein, 2020), we will pay specific attention to the involvement of communities that are rarely given a say in the design of digital democratic tools.…”
Section: Participatory Tool Designmentioning
confidence: 99%