2004
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/37/17/018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet etching of fused silica: a multiplex study

Abstract: The machining process of transparent materials using the laser induced backside wet etching (LIBWE) procedure was studied. In the course of this, experimental investigations and numerical calculations were carried out. Fused silica plates were irradiated by an ArF excimer laser, using a naphthalene–methyl methacrylate solution as an absorbing liquid (concentration 0.85 mol dm−3, absorption coefficient at 193 nm 52 200 cm−1). The etch rate dependence on the applied laser fluence (varied from 110 to 860 mJ cm−2)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior was observed by many research groups [13][14][27][28][29][30][31][32], but correct, coherent explanation have not existed yet. We have already presented a LIBWE model in our previous papers [15,27], which gave relatively good results for LIBWE applying ArF laser (nevertheless the calculated threshold fluence was higher than the measured one), but this model did not work for KrF experiments, namely etching was not predicted in the applied fluence range (up to ≈2 J/cm 2 ). The main difference between the two laser sources is in their wavelengths and therefore in the significant difference between the absorption coefficients of the absorbing liquid (α ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This behavior was observed by many research groups [13][14][27][28][29][30][31][32], but correct, coherent explanation have not existed yet. We have already presented a LIBWE model in our previous papers [15,27], which gave relatively good results for LIBWE applying ArF laser (nevertheless the calculated threshold fluence was higher than the measured one), but this model did not work for KrF experiments, namely etching was not predicted in the applied fluence range (up to ≈2 J/cm 2 ). The main difference between the two laser sources is in their wavelengths and therefore in the significant difference between the absorption coefficients of the absorbing liquid (α ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These layers can be identified as the modified layers, although these thicknesses were overestimated by the calculations. This residual melted and quickly refrozen layer might answer the question, how the modified layer is reproduced from pulse to pulse: the carbon (originate from the organic liquid molecules due to the high energy UV photons) probably can build in the upper part of the residual melted fused silica layer (by diffusion and/or due to the high pressure in the liquid [27,29,38]). …”
Section: Numerical Model and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of H-LIBWE to the properties of the processed surface was investigated in [38,39] and gave evidence for a strong surface modification and incubation. Some studies aim at the comparison of experimental LIBWE results with (numerical) model calculations [32,40]. In [32], it was found that the interface temperature at H-LIBWE is below the melting temperature of the fused silica for the laser fluences at the etch threshold; however, in this work interface modifications were neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies aim at the comparison of experimental LIBWE results with (numerical) model calculations [32,40]. In [32], it was found that the interface temperature at H-LIBWE is below the melting temperature of the fused silica for the laser fluences at the etch threshold; however, in this work interface modifications were neglected. In Table 1, the most important characteristics of patterning processes for transparent materials are listed for H-and M-LIBWE in comparison to laser ablation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation