2013
DOI: 10.1021/es403089q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Western European Land Use Regression Incorporating Satellite- and Ground-Based Measurements of NO2 and PM10

Abstract: Land use regression (LUR) models typically investigate within-urban variability in air pollution. Recent improvements in data quality and availability, including satellite-derived pollutant measurements, support fine-scale LUR modeling for larger areas. Here, we describe NO 2 and PM 10 LUR models for Western Europe (years: 2005−2007) based on >1500 EuroAirnet monitoring sites covering background, industrial, and traffic environments. Predictor variables include land use characteristics, population density, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
144
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
144
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the SPER is low when estimating PM 2.5 in Beijing and results in some negative concentration estimations, which is not consistent with the fact that the minimum PM 2.5 concentration should be zero [41]. In some recent studies, attempts were made to improve the accuracy of PM 2.5 estimates by using the following two approaches: (1) adding more predictor variables, e.g., on-road mobile emissions and stationary emissions data were added to LUR models in [27], satellite data were added in [33], and industry, commerce, and construction activities were added in [42]; and (2) combining LUR models with other models, e.g., a dispersion model in [36], and the Bayesian maximum entropy method in [38]. The first approach has more restrictions because the use of different regions in different countries results in different types of variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the SPER is low when estimating PM 2.5 in Beijing and results in some negative concentration estimations, which is not consistent with the fact that the minimum PM 2.5 concentration should be zero [41]. In some recent studies, attempts were made to improve the accuracy of PM 2.5 estimates by using the following two approaches: (1) adding more predictor variables, e.g., on-road mobile emissions and stationary emissions data were added to LUR models in [27], satellite data were added in [33], and industry, commerce, and construction activities were added in [42]; and (2) combining LUR models with other models, e.g., a dispersion model in [36], and the Bayesian maximum entropy method in [38]. The first approach has more restrictions because the use of different regions in different countries results in different types of variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, effective measures of preventing air pollution are indispensable to achieving sustainability. Accurate air pollution distribution is the analysis base for effective measures of preventing air the LUR model has been widely used to study the spatial distribution of environmental pollutants (such as fine particulate pollutants [24,[26][27][28][29], black carbon [30,31], NO 2 [12,[32][33][34], NO x [12], and O 3 [35]). The LUR model uses geographic information systems (i.e., spatial analysis, spatial overlay, and buffer analysis) to compute the quantitative values of several predictor variables (such as land use, road traffic, and terrain variables) for specific buffers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, CTMs are only valid if based on a comprehensive and detailed emission database. To overcome limitations of each of the models and optimally make use of the respective strengths, we propose to combine the two approaches into a hybrid model [43,44]. These hybrid models are usually based on the LUR model since LURs are by design much easier to modify.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel remote sensing, satellite-based tools combined with local measurements and land-use information may become highly attractive to define air quality retrospectively and prospectively in space and time ( Fig. 2 and 3) 67 . The combination of the pollution space with individually collected information on time-activity patterns, using personal mobile micro technology, will further improve the assessment of exposure on various time scales and for specific sources.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that American Predictor variables include land use characteristics, population density, and length of major and minor roads in zones from 0.1 to 10 km, altitude, and distance to sea. The models were improved using satellite-based data (reprinted with permission from Vienneau et al 67 .…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%