2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

West Virginia's model of buprenorphine expansion: Preliminary results

Abstract: West Virginia (WV) is situated at the epicenter of the opioid epidemic with the highest rates of overdose deaths and some of the lowest rates of access to life saving evidence-based medication assisted treatment (MAT) for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). WV used a modified hub-and-spoke model to build organizational capacity for facilities to use buprenorphine to treat patients with OUD and to provide ongoing case consultation. The purpose of this study is to 1) describe the groupbase model of buprenor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, we noticed this retention rate was higher than that of the COAT clinic, the buprenorphine MOUD program that this clinic is adapted from. In COAT, a sample analysis showed that 37.8% of patients were retained less than one year and 14.7% were retained 10 or more years [ 9 , 10 ]. The increased retention in the High-Risk Pain Clinic may be explained at least in part by a selection effect, as patients with active SUD required at least 90 days of sobriety prior to entering the program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, we noticed this retention rate was higher than that of the COAT clinic, the buprenorphine MOUD program that this clinic is adapted from. In COAT, a sample analysis showed that 37.8% of patients were retained less than one year and 14.7% were retained 10 or more years [ 9 , 10 ]. The increased retention in the High-Risk Pain Clinic may be explained at least in part by a selection effect, as patients with active SUD required at least 90 days of sobriety prior to entering the program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the hardest-hit states in the nation, West Virginia began developing a comprehensive approach to the treatment of OUD in the early 2000s, focusing on the use of combination buprenorphine/naloxone (bup/nal) as the medication for OUD. This program has since developed into the Comprehensive Opioid Addiction Treatment (COAT) program that treats over 400 patients with eight prescribers spread over three locations [ 9 , 10 ]. The COAT clinic employs a graded approach to group-based therapy and medical appointments, requiring initial weekly contact with a multidisciplinary treatment team that reduces in frequency with increasing duration of sobriety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Estimates of the prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders in the literature range from 23% 13 to 90%, 14 with most reported to be 45% to 80%. 9,[15][16][17][18][19] In addition to anxiety and affective disorders, 14,[20][21][22] patients with OUD experience high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder 23 and sexual or physical abuse. 18 Given the large overlap between mental illness and substance use disorders, one may posit that having comorbid diagnoses may be a risk factor for early treatment discontinuation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These psychosocial needs are integral to patient health and functioning, particularly among patients with OUD. For example, 60% to 70% of patients with OUD are unemployed, 13,17,18,[22][23][24][25] and 60% earn less than $10 000 annually. 25 Approximately 25% to 30% of patients receiving MOUD report homelessness and/ or housing instability, factors that reduce the likelihood of seeking treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally developed and demonstrated to be effective in Vermont (Brooklyn & Sigmon, 2017), the Hub-and-Spoke model is a system-level intervention that entails the use of opioid treatment programs serving as hubs that then transfer clients to spokes in the community, including primary care providers and office-based practitioners. Miele et al (2019) and Darfler, Sandoval, Pearce Antonini, and Urada (2019) provide two companion articles focused on the implementation and preliminary evaluation results for California's STR Hub-and-Spoke model, while Reif et al (2019) and Winstanley et al (2019) provide descriptive data related to Hub-and-Spoke programs in Washington state and West Virginia respectively. While the Hub-and-Spoke model has an existing evidence-base, these four articles provide important details regarding its adaptation and implementation in new contexts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%