2016
DOI: 10.1080/21699763.2015.1118400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Welfare user roles in a conservative welfare state. Are Germans citizens, consumers or co-producers?

Abstract: Many welfare states have embraced choice and market mechanisms since the 1990s. With respect to welfare users, it has been argued that this led to a change from citizens to consumers. This paper challenges this observation and discusses changes of welfare user roles in the German welfare state. The main argument rests on the assumption that user roles are much more complex and include claimants and co-producers in addition to citizens and consumers. Based on this heuristic model of multiple user roles, empiric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In German healthcare, policy discussions have increasingly focused on enabling patients in sharing their views on care quality (Blank, 2009; Ewert, 2011; Köppe et al., 2016; Newman & Kuhlmann, 2007). This shift is reflected in hospital management rhetoric as well, where one of the most prominent buzzwords has become “value‐based healthcare” (Porter & Guth, 2012), an approach to internal control that seeks to make patient experiences part of quality measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In German healthcare, policy discussions have increasingly focused on enabling patients in sharing their views on care quality (Blank, 2009; Ewert, 2011; Köppe et al., 2016; Newman & Kuhlmann, 2007). This shift is reflected in hospital management rhetoric as well, where one of the most prominent buzzwords has become “value‐based healthcare” (Porter & Guth, 2012), an approach to internal control that seeks to make patient experiences part of quality measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships between public sector organizations and public service users have changed quite a bit over the past several decades. With the rise of New Public Management (Hood, 1991; Hyndman & Lapsley, 2016), individuals have been increasingly addressed as knowledgeable consumers of public services, rather than as passive claimants (Arnaboldi, Lapsley, & Dal Molin, 2016; Köppe, Ewert, & Blank, 2016; Watkins & Arrington, 2007). Under a “user‐oriented” public management paradigm, the citizen has been idealized as a user with a view and a voice, someone whose opinions and experiences ought to be considered when assessing service provision (Pflueger, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of citizenship has moved away from a mere status or entitlement to a combination of different characteristics, obligations, and responsibilities (Newman, ). Being a citizen has been described as going along with being a user (Barnes, ), a consumer, a co‐producer, a responsibilized agent (Fotaki, ), or a claimant, especially in social welfare systems in most Western countries (Köppe et al., ). In the context of NPM, citizens have been featured as users and customers of public services, for whom the services ought to be optimized or who may choose different service options on quasi‐markets (ibid.).…”
Section: Theoretical Background: Accounting and Societal Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant literature has also discussed how neoliberal ideas and programs address individual citizens as users, customers, and co‐producers of public services (Köppe, Ewert, & Blank, ). The increased interest in the economic agency of citizens has highlighted the relevance of accounting as a means of governing individuals (Miller & O'Leary, ; Miller & Rose, ; Rose, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the pension insurance, real competition was introduced into the statutory health insurance system, to the extent that that statutory health insurance funds can go into insolvency. From the point of view of the insured, “choice” was established, contributing to a shift from citizens to consumers (Köppe, Ewert, & Blank, ). Since 1996, members can choose funds and are not insured with a specific fund according to their occupation any more, which “deprived the funds of their implicit guarantee of existence” (Gerlinger/Schmucker, , p. 7).…”
Section: Developments In Social Insurance Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%