2019
DOI: 10.1111/spol.12542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The state of the German social insurance state: Reform and resilience

Abstract: At the core of the German system of welfare provision stand social insurance schemes whose central role contributes to Germany being labelled a social insurance state. In recent decades, Germany has been experiencing major social policy reforms that are often evaluated as paradigm changes. These changes have been reflected in analyses that sometimes even questioned common classifications of the German welfare state. The article sheds light on recent developments that have affected the German system of social i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary concerns associated with an LTCI system are related to the future sustainability and affordability of long-term care financing and the equality of the current funding mechanism [ 1 , 2 ]. Government funding is increasingly burdened by the financing of long-term care, especially for the countries with a social LTCI system, such as in Germany and Japan [ 18 , 19 ]. Currently, some countries have carried out reforms on their LTCI systems to make them sustainable by increasing the individual payment or reducing the reimbursement rate to mitigate the government’s burden [ 18 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary concerns associated with an LTCI system are related to the future sustainability and affordability of long-term care financing and the equality of the current funding mechanism [ 1 , 2 ]. Government funding is increasingly burdened by the financing of long-term care, especially for the countries with a social LTCI system, such as in Germany and Japan [ 18 , 19 ]. Currently, some countries have carried out reforms on their LTCI systems to make them sustainable by increasing the individual payment or reducing the reimbursement rate to mitigate the government’s burden [ 18 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the mid‐1980s onwards, older claimants with an adequate contribution record were entitled to receive benefits for 18–32 months at most, with the maximum period of 32 months applying to those aged 54 or older (since 1997: 57 or older) (Bothfeld & Rosenthal, 2018: p. 282). In 2006, the maximum duration of benefit entitlement was reduced to 18 months (Dlugosz et al, 2014; Blank, 2020: p. 514), only to be raised again in 2008 after intense debate. Since then, unemployed persons aged 50–54 have been entitled to receive unemployment benefits for up to 15 months, those aged 55–57 for up to 18 months, and claimants aged 58 and above can receive benefits for up to 24 months.…”
Section: Institutional Change In German Unemployment Insurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, reforms to the LTC system planned for 2017-2023 focus on maintaining sustainability of the LTC insurance system by increasing co-payment rates to 30% for high-income users of LTC (Ministry of Health and Welfare 2017). The German system, which is based on a pay-as-you-go mechanism, has increased mandatory contributions from 1.7% in 1996 to 3.1% in 2019 (Blank 2019). For countries with means-tested systems such as the United States, more emphasis is on individual responsibility and ability to pay for LTC.…”
Section: Challenges Reforms and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%