Welfare Regimes, Welfare Systems and Housing in Southern Europe

Abstract

Are housing provision systems in southern Europe (Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece) different from those in northern Europe? Answering this question requires a way of theorizing housing systems, which locates them within their broader societal contexts. After setting out some of the key empirical differences between northern and southern, the paper reanalyses Esping-Andersen's work on welfare regimes and reviews housing-specific work using these ideas as a basis for identifying differences between northern and southern European welfare and housing systems. Three key factors emerge from this analysis: the capacity of civil administration, the linkages between formal and informal segments in the labour market, and the operation of extended familial networks in welfare distribution. On this basis, the paper presents a more institutionally robust analysis of the relationships between welfare and housing provision systems in southern Europe. The conclusions address the problems of using welfare regime theory to analyse housing provision as well as some of the specific housing problems associated with socio-economic change in southern Europe.Housing, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, welfare regimes, clientelism, segmented labour markets, extended families,

Varieties of Residential Capitalism in the International Political Economy: Old Welfare States and the New Politics of Housing

“…The institutional structure surrounding housing thus has important political consequences paralleling those of welfare institutions. Like welfare programs, houses convey certain property rights onto people, and social housing systems differ according to common welfare types (see Allen, 2006). But unlike the benefits from welfare programs, houses potentially are tradable assets.…”

Jaunimo apsirūpinimas būstu: galimybės ir problemos

“…Dualistinė nuomos sistema vyrauja liberaliose kapitalistinėse visuomenėse, kur stengiamasi išvengti valstybės dalyvavimo būsto rinkoje. Mažai išvystytas valstybinių būstų nuomos sektorius lemia tai, kad toks būstas už mažą nuomos kainą teikiamas tik marginalizuotoms grupėms (Allen 2006;Hoekstra 2010;Hoekstra 2009). Nuomos kainos dėl nereguliuojamos rinkos yra aukštos, o nuomininkų apsauga -žema, tad tokiu būdu skatinama būsto nuosavybė, suteikianti pelną ir saugumą, o gyvenimo kokybės skirtumai tarp skirtingais būdais vartojančių būstą asmenų yra labai dideli.…”

La dimensión económica de la exclusión residencial: Cataluña en el contexto europeo

“…Cuando el primero concepto es comparativamente mayor (p. e. Malta o Portugal), el segundo es menor, y viceversa (p. e. España y Cataluña). Otro aspecto característico es el fomento de la propiedad (Allen et al 2004;Allen, 2006). A diferencia de la mayoría de países comunitarios, el escaso gasto público en ayudas al pago de la vivienda se dirige en su mayor parte a facilitar el acceso a la propiedad en lugar de centrarse en las personas que viven en una vivienda de alquiler (Figura 9).…”