2008
DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.2.438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Welfare Costs of Inflation in a Menu Cost Model

Abstract: In this paper, we use both the new facts and the new quantitative models to revisit an old question, namely, that of quantifying the welfare benefits of low inflation. Our model includes two channels through which steady-state inflation affects welfare. The first channel is based on the presence of nominal rigidities, which induce fluctuations in relative prices between products whose prices adjust, and products whose prices remain fixed, thus distorting the composition of output away from efficiency, and lowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
65
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we adopted a Calvo pricing scheme that yields a simple and transparent approximation of the utility of the representative agent. The main shortcoming of this choice is that the selection e¤ect that would be present in a menu cost version of this model might also mute the welfare costs of nominal distortions (Golosov and Lucas, 2007;Burstein and Hellwig, 2008;. However, we have no particular reason to believe that the selection e¤ect would change the relative performance of the targeting rules that we consider in our welfare analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we adopted a Calvo pricing scheme that yields a simple and transparent approximation of the utility of the representative agent. The main shortcoming of this choice is that the selection e¤ect that would be present in a menu cost version of this model might also mute the welfare costs of nominal distortions (Golosov and Lucas, 2007;Burstein and Hellwig, 2008;. However, we have no particular reason to believe that the selection e¤ect would change the relative performance of the targeting rules that we consider in our welfare analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a "menu cost" model (see also Burstein and Hellwig 2008 for a similar exercise without ZLB, which leads to negative optimal inflation rate). As a matter of fact, Nakamura et al (2016) argue that the presence of state-dependent pricing limits considerably the positive relationship between inflation and price dispersion, thus limiting the costs of inflation.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ζ is a major determinant of financial flows for privately held firms 7 , later, we perform robustness checks on ζ. Furthermore, we set α, one of the parameters in the firm production function to 0.3 and choose the elasticity of substitution across firms or goods to be ρ = 4 in line with estimates from micro data evidence (see Burstein and Hellwig (2008)). …”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%