2013
DOI: 10.1366/12-06757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted Fusion of Multiple Models for Wavelength Selection

Abstract: A new method based on the weighted fusion of multiple models is presented for wavelength selection in multivariate calibration of spectral data. It fuses the regression coefficients of multiple models with weights based on minimum mean square error to improve the accuracy and stability of the wavelength selection. To validate the performance of the proposed method, it was applied to the partial least squares (PLS) modeling of three near-infrared spectral datasets and compared with full-spectrum PLS, genetic al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thought that the spectral regions extracted with the CA were subjective, and some redundant and inaccurate spectral information might be occurred in the predictive model, which will definitely produce negative effect on the model performance. For SPA+MLR, the spectral wavelengths were directly and initially determined and then were used to establish the monitor model, and this may lead to the fact that more redundant and irrelevant spectral information will negatively contribute the model performance (Soares et al., 2013; Zeng, Wen, Wen, & Hong, 2013). However, for the PLSR+SMLR, the important spectral regions which were highly related with the ChD of winter wheat were determined by using the combination of the VIP and B‐coefficient derived from the PLSR analysis, then the SMLR were further applied to selected the sensitive wavelengths which proved to be important to the ChD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thought that the spectral regions extracted with the CA were subjective, and some redundant and inaccurate spectral information might be occurred in the predictive model, which will definitely produce negative effect on the model performance. For SPA+MLR, the spectral wavelengths were directly and initially determined and then were used to establish the monitor model, and this may lead to the fact that more redundant and irrelevant spectral information will negatively contribute the model performance (Soares et al., 2013; Zeng, Wen, Wen, & Hong, 2013). However, for the PLSR+SMLR, the important spectral regions which were highly related with the ChD of winter wheat were determined by using the combination of the VIP and B‐coefficient derived from the PLSR analysis, then the SMLR were further applied to selected the sensitive wavelengths which proved to be important to the ChD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the advantages of reversible-jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo, a random frog wavelength selection approach is proposed and implemented easily [18]. A new wavelength selection method based on the weighted fusion of multiple models is proposed [20], where the different PLS submodels are built with different numbers of latent variables, and then the regression coefficients of multiple PLS models are fused to select the wavelengths. A new wavelength selection method based on the weighted fusion of multiple models is proposed [20], where the different PLS submodels are built with different numbers of latent variables, and then the regression coefficients of multiple PLS models are fused to select the wavelengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wavelength selection algorithm based on exponentially weighted recursive PLS and variance importance in the projection is discussed [19]. A new wavelength selection method based on the weighted fusion of multiple models is proposed [20], where the different PLS submodels are built with different numbers of latent variables, and then the regression coefficients of multiple PLS models are fused to select the wavelengths. A rough set-based wavelength selection method is presented in NIR spectral analysis [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%