2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight Symmetry and Latency Scores for Unexpected Surface Perturbations in Subjects With Traumatic and Vascular Unilateral Transtibial Amputation

Abstract: The subjects with traumatic UTA had a greater reliance on their sound limb, and they had faster latencies and more weight in the sound limb upon experiencing unexpected perturbations compared with the control subjects. Conversely, persons with vascular UTA experienced slower latency responses in the sound limb compared with persons with traumatic UTA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
21
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SOT and LOS test validly identify postural control impairments in the elderly fallers, differentiate fallers from nonfallers, and predict fall risk [2326]. These FP measures are also supported as reliable and valid measures of underlying postural control deficits across neurological populations [2730]. Specific to the PD population, Harro et al [31] reported excellent test-retest reliability for these FP measures, and fair to moderate correlation between the SOT and LOS test and clinical balance measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOT and LOS test validly identify postural control impairments in the elderly fallers, differentiate fallers from nonfallers, and predict fall risk [2326]. These FP measures are also supported as reliable and valid measures of underlying postural control deficits across neurological populations [2730]. Specific to the PD population, Harro et al [31] reported excellent test-retest reliability for these FP measures, and fair to moderate correlation between the SOT and LOS test and clinical balance measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our results, the similarity of trunk RAM across patients may indicate that the trunk is the segment that drives the motion, and that the pelvis compensates. However, with training and familiarity, the unnecessary core muscle demand could be reduced, and may provide more efficient postural control resulting in a reduced risk of falling when navigating an unexpected obstacle (Marigold et al 2005; Molina-Rueda et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a TTA, most individuals rely automatically on their intact leg during standing [3][4][5][6] and walking [7,8]. This strategy is even more pronounced in situations with increased demands for postural control [3,5,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain postural stability both automatic sensorimotor processing (beside others reflecting the adaptability and postural reactivity to unexpected environmental changes) and volitional processing have to be employed [1]. Factors, which have been previously suggested to have impact on automatic or volitional postural control in individuals after lower limb amputation include etiology of amputation [3,4], age [4], activity level, duration of prosthesis use [5,20], stump length [21,22], prosthetic components and alignment [23], fall history [3,10] or fear of falling [24]. However, there is little evidence how these factors may influence the engagement of the prosthetic and/or intact leg with respect to both automatic and volitional aspects of postural control in TTAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%