1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00139-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight distribution considerations in container loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
94
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
94
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, researchers have begun paying more attention to additional practical constraints. For instance, Davies and Bischoff [1999], Eley [2002], and Gehring and Bortfeldt [1997] take into account the weight distribution of cargo within a container. Bischoff [2006] examines the impact of varying load bearing strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, researchers have begun paying more attention to additional practical constraints. For instance, Davies and Bischoff [1999], Eley [2002], and Gehring and Bortfeldt [1997] take into account the weight distribution of cargo within a container. Bischoff [2006] examines the impact of varying load bearing strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This "wall-building" or "layer-building" method proves to be effective for accommodating other practical container loading constraints such as limited bearing strength [Bischoff, 2006] and weight distributions [Davies and Bischoff, 1999] as well as handling pallet loading problems . Generally speaking, the "wallbuilding" technique treats the remaining space after a wall or layer is loaded as a reduced-sized container with some procedures to fill the trapped or unused space within a layer or across layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rich set of requirements makes CP an attractive modeling approach in this domain [12]. Among the additional requirements, Davies & Bischoff [3] highlight the importance of the weight distribution of the loaded container, focusing on the location of the center of gravity (COG). The exact requirements depend on the specific application, especially on the means of transport.…”
Section: Using Completion M To Solve the Container Loading Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For container loading with weight distribution considerations, Davies & Bischoff [3] proposed a heuristic that achieves high space utilization combined with an even weight distribution, and claim that the latter leads to a COG located near to the center of the container. Wodziak & Fadel [20] apply a genetic algorithm to minimize the distance of the COG from the desired location in one, two, and two and a half dimensions.…”
Section: Using Completion M To Solve the Container Loading Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gehring & Bortfeldt (1997) address the problem with several constraints, namely, orientation, load bearing, maximum weight, stability and weight distribution. Davies & Bischoff (1999) propose a heuristic that is able to produce loading arrangements which combine high space utilization with an even weight distribution of the cargo. Bortfeldt et al (2003) and Mack et al (2004) consider constraints of orientation and stability in terms of sections of the cargo that overhang beyond the edge of the box(es) supporting it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%