Wege zu verantwortungsvoller Forschung und Entwicklung im Bereich der Pflegerobotik: Die ambivalente Rolle der Ethik

Kehl, Christoph

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-22698-5_8

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 30 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To overcome this barrier, discussions about possible functions and limitations should start early and follow an iterative process to involve individual perceptions and to moderate expectations. 49…”

Section: Barriersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundRobots in healthcare are gaining increasing attention; however, their implementation is challenging due to the complexity of both interventions themselves and the contexts in which they are implemented. The objective of this integrative review is to identify barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic systems in nursing.MethodsArticles published from 2002 to 2019 reporting on projects to implement robotic devices in nursing care were searched on Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL and databases on funded research projects (Community Research and Development Information Services and Technische Informationsbibliothek) and in journals for robotic research in November 2017 and July 2019 for an update. No restrictions regarding study designs were imposed. All included articles underwent quality assessments with design-specific critical appraisal tools. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were classified using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions framework.ResultsAfter removing all duplicates, the search revealed 11 204 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. The majority of the studies dealt with the implementation of robots designed to support individuals, either living at home or in nursing homes (n=11). The studies were conducted in Europe, the USA and New Zealand and were carried out in nursing homes, individual living environments, hospital units and laboratories. The quality of reporting and quality of evidence were low in most studies. The most frequently reported barriers were in socioeconomic and ethical domains and were within the implementation outcomes domain. The most frequently reported facilitators were related to the sociocultural context, implementation process and implementation strategies.DiscussionThis review identified barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic devices in nursing within different dimensions. The results serve as a basis for the development of suitable implementation strategies to reduce potential barriers and promote the integration of elements to facilitate implementation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018073486.

show abstract

Section: Barriersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More people will need health care while fewer family members will be available to provide support. Due to the declining birth rate, future generations will consist of fewer people who could potentially take on the care of their parents or grandparents [ 11 ]. Other factors making it more difficult for family members to provide care include the rise in women’s employment, with women traditionally taking on the caring role, and the growing mobility of future generations [ 11 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Due to the declining birth rate, future generations will consist of fewer people who could potentially take on the care of their parents or grandparents [ 11 ]. Other factors making it more difficult for family members to provide care include the rise in women’s employment, with women traditionally taking on the caring role, and the growing mobility of future generations [ 11 ]. According to population forecasts, the percentage of people over 67 years of age will rise steeply [ 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop

Busse¹,

Kernebeck²,

Nef³

et al. 2021

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Interest in digital technologies in the health care sector is growing and can be a way to reduce the burden on professional caregivers while helping people to become more independent. Social robots are regarded as a special form of technology that can be usefully applied in professional caregiving with the potential to focus on interpersonal contact. While implementation is progressing slowly, a debate on the concepts and applications of social robots in future care is necessary. Objective In addition to existing studies with a focus on societal attitudes toward social robots, there is a need to understand the views of professional caregivers and patients. This study used desired future scenarios to collate the perspectives of experts and analyze the significance for developing the place of social robots in care. Methods In February 2020, an expert workshop was held with 88 participants (health professionals and educators; [PhD] students of medicine, health care, professional care, and technology; patient advocates; software developers; government representatives; and research fellows) from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Using the scenario methodology, the possibilities of analog professional care (Analog Care), fully robotic professional care (Robotic Care), teams of robots and professional caregivers (Deep Care), and professional caregivers supported by robots (Smart Care) were discussed. The scenarios were used as a stimulus for the development of ideas about future professional caregiving. The discussion was evaluated using qualitative content analysis. Results The majority of the experts were in favor of care in which people are supported by technology (Deep Care) and developed similar scenarios with a focus on dignity-centeredness. The discussions then focused on the steps necessary for its implementation, highlighting a strong need for the development of eHealth competence in society, a change in the training of professional caregivers, and cross-sectoral concepts. The experts also saw user acceptance as crucial to the use of robotics. This involves the acceptance of both professional caregivers and care recipients. Conclusions The literature review and subsequent workshop revealed how decision-making about the value of social robots depends on personal characteristics related to experience and values. There is therefore a strong need to recognize individual perspectives of care before social robots become an integrated part of care in the future.

show abstract

“…durch Nutzername und Passwort oder andere Authentisierungsmethoden, die im Projektverlauf untersucht werden, verbunden werden. Flankiert wird dies durch punktuelle Befragungen durch Versuchsleiter.Das übergreifende Ziel dieser partizipatorischen Formate besteht darin, die wertorientierte Gestaltung der konkreten Assistenzrobotik-Szenarien in einen möglichst breiten Diskurs mit der Öffentlichkeit einzubetten -auch, um einen "kollektiven Reflexionsprozess über wünschenswerte Ziele" eines Lebens mit ubiquitärer Robotik im Kontext des Alterns und von Behinderung in Gang zu setzen und so gezielt "gesellschaftliche Reflexions-und Kritikkapazitäten" fruchtbar zu machen(Kehl 2018, S.158, Wehling 2010. Die partizipatorischen Formate des Konsortiums sollen einerseits den Diskurs der technikethischen Fragen strukturell und iterativ an den Gestaltungsprozess der technischen Anwendung binden.…”

unclassified

Kompetenzzentrum für prosoziale und vertrauensfördernde Robotik (ProVeRo) - Förderkennzeichen 16SV8588 Kolja

Kühnlenz,

Kriza

et al. 2024

Roboter Für Assistenzfunktionen : Konzeptstudien Für Die Interaktion in Der Praxis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vertrauensvolle Koexistenz und Interaktion ist eine der wesentlichen Grundvoraussetzungen für die Einführung und den dauerhaften Betrieb interaktiver robotischer Systeme sowie eine effektive Zusammenarbeit von Menschen und Robotern. Insbesondere im öffentlichen Raum und im Zusammenhang mit naiven Nutzern sind diese Aspekte von besonderer Bedeutung. Der Bedarf und die gesellschaftliche Relevanz derartiger Systeme ist hoch, nicht zuletzt bedingt durch den demographischen Wandel, aber auch wirtschaftliche und Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte spielen hierbei eine wesentliche Rolle. Insbesondere in ländlichen und Randregionen existiert ein hoher Bedarf an speziell mobilitätsunterstützender Assistenz. Hier soll das Kompetenzzentrum am Beispiel der Demographieregion Oberfranken einen Beitrag hinsichtlich realweltlich etablierbarer Systeme für eine prosoziale und vertrauensvolle Koexistenz leisten. Thema des Verbundprojektes / ProblembeschreibungEine zentrale Zukunftsaufgabe und Kern des Zentrums ist daher, robotische Assistenzsysteme für die breite Masse mittels verteilter öffentlich zugänglicher Systeme -z.B. in Form von "Robot Sharing" -zugänglich zu machen und hierfür als Enabler intelligente 259 Sammelband "Roboter für Assistenzfunktionen: Interaktion in der Praxis"

show abstract

Wege zu verantwortungsvoller Forschung und Entwicklung im Bereich der Pflegerobotik: Die ambivalente Rolle der Ethik

Cited by 10 publications

References 30 publications

Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop

Kompetenzzentrum für prosoziale und vertrauensfördernde Robotik (ProVeRo) - Förderkennzeichen 16SV8588 Kolja

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About