Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review

Abstract

BackgroundRobots in healthcare are gaining increasing attention; however, their implementation is challenging due to the complexity of both interventions themselves and the contexts in which they are implemented. The objective of this integrative review is to identify barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic systems in nursing.MethodsArticles published from 2002 to 2019 reporting on projects to implement robotic devices in nursing care were searched on Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL and databases on funded research projects (Community Research and Development Information Services and Technische Informationsbibliothek) and in journals for robotic research in November 2017 and July 2019 for an update. No restrictions regarding study designs were imposed. All included articles underwent quality assessments with design-specific critical appraisal tools. Barriers to and facilitators of implementation were classified using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions framework.ResultsAfter removing all duplicates, the search revealed 11 204 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. The majority of the studies dealt with the implementation of robots designed to support individuals, either living at home or in nursing homes (n=11). The studies were conducted in Europe, the USA and New Zealand and were carried out in nursing homes, individual living environments, hospital units and laboratories. The quality of reporting and quality of evidence were low in most studies. The most frequently reported barriers were in socioeconomic and ethical domains and were within the implementation outcomes domain. The most frequently reported facilitators were related to the sociocultural context, implementation process and implementation strategies.DiscussionThis review identified barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic devices in nursing within different dimensions. The results serve as a basis for the development of suitable implementation strategies to reduce potential barriers and promote the integration of elements to facilitate implementation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018073486.

The Increasing Centrality of Robotic Technology in the Context of Nursing Care: Bioethical Implications Analyzed through a Scoping Review Approach

“…In an interesting review, Servaty et al [ 21 ] attempted to identify the main barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of robotic systems in nursing.…”

Assistive Healthcare Robotics – Challenges in Nursing Service Innovation: Critical Review

“…Nursing robots can execute routinely scheduled rounds, as they are not susceptible to fatigue, boredom, burnout, or forgetfulness [19], and can offer a welcome relief to the nursing staff. For instance, they alleviate healthcare workers of time or physical strain; as well provide valuable patient information [20]. Various technical innovations are born in response to the current shortage of nursing and caregiving practitioners, as well as increasing healthcare costs [21].…”

“…Robots may provide feedback to residents, indicating whether or not they like being treated or touched. Also, robots can be sentinels for physical safety in sensing fall risk and promoting movement performance [26,16,20].…”

“…This is a textbook example of moral hazard, in which one group governs resource decisions while another bears the brunt of the benefits or burdens. A reduced quality of social relationships with individual people [8] could lead to dependency and even loss of control [20].…”

Nutzungsoptionen von technischen Assistenzsystemen für Personen mit Demenz in der Schweiz: eine qualitative Interviewstudie mit Expertinnen und Experten

“…Insbesondere mangelt es an Informationen dazu, welche Intervention durch wen mit welcher professionellen Absicht wie durchgeführt wurde [9]. Hinzu kommen sozioökonomische und ethische Barrieren bei der Einführung technischer Assistenzsysteme [5,10,11]. Hierbei sind Herausforderungen in professionsbezogener, gesellschaftlicher und ethischer Hinsicht beschrieben.…”