2009
DOI: 10.1049/iet-sen.2008.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web usability inspection technique based on design perspectives

Abstract: Resumo. Este artigo apresenta uma técnica de inspeção de usabilidade (WDP -Web Design Perspectives-Based Usability Evaluation) e a metodologia experimental utilizada como base para seu desenvolvimento e aprimoramento. Até o presente momento foram executados três estudos experimentais (um secundário e dois primários) que levaram à versão atual da técnica WDP. Resultados indicam que a técnica é viável e que é possivelmente mais efetiva e tão eficiente quanto a Avaliação Heurística proposta por Nielsen. Abstract.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…− HE has provided useful results when used to conduct Web usability evaluations [Sutcliffe 2002;Allen et al 2006;Ssemugabi and De Villiers 2007]. − HE has often been used for comparison with other inspection methods [Costabile and Matera 2001;Chattratichart and Brodie 2004;Conte et al 2009]. − No usability evaluation method has been previously defined for application in model-driven Web development processes.…”
Section: Methods Evaluatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…− HE has provided useful results when used to conduct Web usability evaluations [Sutcliffe 2002;Allen et al 2006;Ssemugabi and De Villiers 2007]. − HE has often been used for comparison with other inspection methods [Costabile and Matera 2001;Chattratichart and Brodie 2004;Conte et al 2009]. − No usability evaluation method has been previously defined for application in model-driven Web development processes.…”
Section: Methods Evaluatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we employed the Effectiveness and Efficiency measures as suggested by Hartson et al [2000] for formative evaluations (i.e., usability evaluations during the Web development process). These measures have also been employed in similar empirical studies [Conte et al 2009]. In addition, the subjective measures employed were Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Satisfaction of Use, based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) [Davis 1989], a well-known and thoroughly validated model for evaluating information technologies.…”
Section: Threats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we have designed and executed a feasibility study to verify if the Web DUE technique is feasible regarding the number of detected defects and the time spent. In this study we compared the Web DUE technique with the WDP technique (Conte et al, 2009). Despite the fact that the WDP is not a technique for the evaluation of paper based prototypes, it is the Web DUE's predecessor, since the Web DUE is based on the WDP.…”
Section: B Web Due Inspection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each pair HxP, the WDP provides a set of hints in order to aid inspectors in finding usability problems when evaluating Web applications. Furthermore, the WDP technique has been proved feasible for the usability evaluation of Web applications during several empirical studies (Conte et al, 2009).…”
Section: A the Web Due Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation