2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2006.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web search enhancement by mining user actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…− 0.0174 [6] 0.180498 [3] − 0.18024 [7] − 0.17061 framework, R p (i k , t j ) and R m (i k , t j ). Similarly, in the second experiment, another two lists with top 10 posts are given, but in this case, one is the search result returned by the ranking function R p (i k , t k, j ), and the other is the result from Technorati blog post search service.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…− 0.0174 [6] 0.180498 [3] − 0.18024 [7] − 0.17061 framework, R p (i k , t j ) and R m (i k , t j ). Similarly, in the second experiment, another two lists with top 10 posts are given, but in this case, one is the search result returned by the ranking function R p (i k , t k, j ), and the other is the result from Technorati blog post search service.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several novel frameworks to learn user preferences have been presented in the past, and they considered various user responses such as relevance judgments, clickstreams, sequence in which users pick up the results, and time spent at a specific document [3,6,15]. While the methods using the explicit feedback like relevance judgments have been very effective to automatically tailor the ranking functions to particular user groups or collections, they rely on user interactions to identify relevant results in a ranking, which is often hard to implement in real world services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also plan to incorporate user feedback into the recommender system, in a similar vein as it is done for web search engines (see e.g. [27,28]). In particular, relevance feedback 5 can be very useful to update the positive and negative preference relation, and may help to reduce their associated uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the ratings given by users, where as mentioned a 0 means no rating is available for this item. Using (28) and (29), the fuzzy relations P + and P À are established and shown in Table 2.…”
Section: A Trade Exhibition Recommender System For E-governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, satisfaction is the time a user prints, saves, marks, e-mails or copies a document or part of it. In addition, it is important to consider spending more time by the users in fast investigation of documents and the great importance with which the document is perceived by the users (Beg, 2007 being beyond customer's imagination, meeting expectations, willingness to reuse, and praising and recommending a product or tool to others. Perceived usefulness is the extent an individual believes using a definite system promotes his career performance (Davis, 1989;Mothwick and Malhotra, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%