2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-and-only item recommendation with fuzzy logic techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For over 5 months we logged the explicit and implicit user feedback provided about the events by means of rating systems and page visits. This events dataset was particularly interesting to test our recommendation algorithm because events are one-and-only items [9] and difficult to recommend with a non-hybrid recommender.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For over 5 months we logged the explicit and implicit user feedback provided about the events by means of rating systems and page visits. This events dataset was particularly interesting to test our recommendation algorithm because events are one-and-only items [9] and difficult to recommend with a non-hybrid recommender.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each factor F is computed as a value ranging from 0 to 100, normalizing the result of the computation, if needed 4 . We also compute a qualitative version of the value, that is produced by using two thresholds 0 ≤ θ min < θ max ≤ 100.…”
Section: Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Facebook 1 "events" can be regarded as activities according to this definition. Activities, as "one-and-only items" [4] have some peculiarities:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This time dependency of one-and-only items, like events, has been tackled in related research. Cornelis et al developed a framework that uses fuzzy logic, allowing to reflect the uncertain information in the domain and considering the time factors of events [11]. However, the computational complexity of such a solution is high, making it difficult to employ on large-scale event distribution systems.…”
Section: Traditional Collaborative Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%